{rfName}
An

Indexed in

License and use

Citations

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Reynaers AmAuthor

Share

Publications
>
Article

An exploratory study on the impact of administrative traditions on value profiles and value conflicts of dutch and spanish academic professionals

Publicated to:Gestion y Politica Publica. 32 (1): 69-97 - 2023-01-01 32(1), DOI: 10.29265/gypp.v32i1.2152

Authors: de Graaf, Gjalt; Reynaers, Anne-Marie

Affiliations

Univ Autonoma Madrid, Fac Derecho Edificio Ciencias Jurid Polit & Econ, Dept Ciencia Polit & Relac Int, 1 Planta C Marie Curie,1,Ciudad Univ Cantoblanco, Madrid 28049, Spain - Author
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid - Author
Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Bestuurswetenschap Politicol, Hoofdgebouw VU,kamer 2E-72,De Boelelaan 1105, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands - Author
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam - Author

Abstract

The value profiles of public sector workers and the value conflicts they face are dependent on organizational characteristics, it has been suggested. However, little is known about the influence of administrative traditions on these profiles and conflicts in professsional settings. Whereas some suggest administrative traditions might be influential, others maintain that professional characteristics determine which values are considered important and which value conflicts are experienced. This exploratory study compares Dutch and Spanish academic teachers in order to empirically assess the extent of any variation in the value profiles and value conflicts of professionals working in the same sector but in countries with different state traditions. The analysis of Q methodological data and interview data (N = 63) reveals similarities as well as differences and suggests that it is an interplay between professional characteristics and a country’s administrative tradition that determines which values are considered to be important and which conflicts are experienced.

Keywords

administrative traditionsin-ternational comparisonprofessionalismvalue profilesAdministrative traditionsInternational comparisonProfessionalismValue conflictsValue profiles

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Gestion y Politica Publica due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency Scopus (SJR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2023, it was in position , thus managing to position itself as a Q2 (Segundo Cuartil), in the category Political Science and International Relations. Notably, the journal is positioned en el Cuartil Q4 for the agency WoS (JCR) in the category Public Administration.

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-07-02:

  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 3 (PlumX).

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

This work has been carried out with international collaboration, specifically with researchers from: Netherlands.

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: Last Author (REYNAERS ., ANNE MARIE).