{rfName}
EU

Indexed in

License and use

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Balsa AAuthor
Share
Publications
>
Article

EULAR points to consider for therapeutic drug monitoring of biopharmaceuticals in inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases

Publicated to:ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES. 82 (1): 65-73 - 2022-05-12 82(1), DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-222155

Authors: Krieckaert CLM; Van Tubergen A; Gehin JE; Hernández-Breijo B; Le Mélédo G; Balsa A; Böhm P; Cucnik S; Elkayam O; Goll GL; Hooijberg F; Jani M; Kiely PDW; McCarthy N; Mulleman D; Navarro-Compán V; Payne K; Perry ME; Plasencia-Rodriguez C; Stones SR; Syversen SW; De Vries A; Ward KM; Wolbink G; Isaacs JD

Affiliations

Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center - Author
Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis , Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust - Author
Centre Hospitalier Regional et Universitaire de Tours - Author
Collaboro Consulting - Author
Collaboro Consulting, EULAR Patient Res Partner, Manchester, Lancs, England - Author
Deutsch Rheuma Liga Bundesverband, Bonn, Germany - Author
Diakonhjemmet Hosp, Dept Rheumatol, Oslo, Norway - Author
Diakonhjemmet Hosp, Rheumatol & Res, Oslo, Norway - Author
Diakonhjemmet Sykehus - Author
Diakonhjemmet Univ Coll & Hosp, Rheumatol, Oslo, Norway - Author
Diakonhjemmet University College - Author
Forschungspartner - Author
Hospital Universitario La Paz - Author
La Paz Univ Hosp, Immunorheumatol Res Grp, Madrid, Spain - Author
La Paz Univ Hosp, Rheumatol, Madrid, Spain - Author
Ljubljanski Univ, Klin Ctr, Rheumatol, Ljubljana, Slovenia - Author
Maastricht Univ, Care & Publ Hlth Res Inst, CAPHRI, Maastricht, Netherlands - Author
Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Div Rheumatol, Med, Maastricht, Netherlands - Author
Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Populat Hlth, Hlth Serv Res & Primary Care, Manchester, Lancs, England - Author
Manchester Univ NHS Fdn Trust, Arthrit Res UK Ctr Epidemiol, Manchester, Lancs, England - Author
Manchester Univ NHS Fdn Trust, NIHR Manchester Biomed Res Ctr, Manchester, Lancs, England - Author
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust , Health Innovation Manchester - Author
Newcastle Univ, Translat & Clin Res Inst, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England - Author
Newcastle University , The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust - Author
Newcastle Upon Tyne Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Manchester, Lancs, England - Author
Newcastle Upon Tyne Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Musculoskeletal Unit, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England - Author
Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Med Biochem, Oslo, Norway - Author
Oslo Universitetssykehus , Medisinske Fakultet - Author
Reade Hoofdlocatie Dr Jan van Breemenstr, Rheumatol, Amsterdam, Netherlands - Author
Reade Hoofdlocatie Dr Jan van Breemenstraat - Author
Reade, Amsterdam Rheumatol & Immunol Ctr, Reumatol, Amsterdam, Netherlands - Author
Reg Univ Hosp Ctr Tours, Rheumatol, Tours, France - Author
Royal Alexandra Hosp, Ctr Rheumat Dis, Paisley, Renfrew, Scotland - Author
Royal Alexandra Hospital - Author
Salford Royal NHS Fdn Trust, Rheumatol, Salford, Lancs, England - Author
Sanquin Res, Amsterdam, Netherlands - Author
Sanquin Res, Immunopathol, Amsterdam, Netherlands - Author
Sanquin Research - Author
Sanquin Research , Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center - Author
St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust - Author
St Georges Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Rheumatol, London, England - Author
St Georges Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Inst Med & Biochem Educ, London, England - Author
Tel Aviv Sourasky Med Ctr, Rheumatol, Tel Aviv, Israel - Author
Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center - Author
The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust - Author
Univ Ljubljana, Fac Pharm, Ljubljana, Slovenia - Author
Univ Oslo, Fac Med, Oslo, Norway - Author
Univ Tours, Dept Rheumatol, Tours, France - Author
Université de Tours - Author
Universiteit Maastricht - Author
Univerza v Ljubljani , Univerzitetni Klinični Center Ljubljana - Author
See more

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop EULAR points-to-consider for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of biopharmaceuticals in inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs). METHODS: The points-to-consider were developed in accordance with EULAR standardised operation procedures by a multidisciplinary task force from eight European countries, based on a systematic literature review and expert consensus. Level of evidence and strength of the points-to-consider were determined, and mean levels of agreement among the task force were calculated using a 10-point rating scale. RESULTS: Six overarching principles and 13 points-to-consider were formulated. The level of agreement among the task force for the overarching principles and points-to-consider ranged from 8.4 to 9.9.The overarching principles define TDM and its subtypes, and reinforce the underlying pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic principles, which are relevant to all biopharmaceutical classes. The points-to-consider highlight the clinical utility of the measurement and interpretation of biopharmaceutical blood concentrations and antidrug antibodies in specific clinical scenarios, including factors that influence these parameters. In general, proactive use of TDM is not recommended but reactive TDM could be considered in certain clinical situations. An important factor limiting wider adoption of TDM is the lack of both high quality trials addressing effectiveness and safety of TDM and robust economic evaluation in patients with RMDs. Future research should focus on providing this evidence, as well as on further understanding of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of biopharmaceuticals. CONCLUSION: These points-to-consider are evidence-based and consensus-based statements for the use of TDM of biopharmaceuticals in inflammatory RMDs, addressing the clinical utility of TDM.

Keywords
arthritis, psoriaticarthritis, rheumatoidbiological therapypharmacokineticsArthritis, psoriaticArthritis, rheumatoidBiological therapyPharmacokineticsSpondylitis, ankylosing

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2022, it was in position 2/34, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Rheumatology. Notably, the journal is positioned above the 90th percentile.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from World Citations provided by WoS (ESI, Clarivate), it yields a value for the citation normalization relative to the expected citation rate of: 4.47. This indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: ESI Nov 14, 2024)

This information is reinforced by other indicators of the same type, which, although dynamic over time and dependent on the set of average global citations at the time of their calculation, consistently position the work at some point among the top 50% most cited in its field:

  • Weighted Average of Normalized Impact by the Scopus agency: 7.27 (source consulted: FECYT Feb 2024)
  • Field Citation Ratio (FCR) from Dimensions: 29.16 (source consulted: Dimensions May 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-05-23, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 16
  • Scopus: 48
  • OpenCitations: 37
Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-05-23:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 60.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 59 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 88.53.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 68 (Altmetric).
Leadership analysis of institutional authors

This work has been carried out with international collaboration, specifically with researchers from: France; Germany; Israel; Netherlands; Norway; Slovenia; United Kingdom.