{rfName}
Me

Indexed in

License and use

Icono OpenAccess

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Blanco Alfonso AAuthor

Share

July 11, 2022
Publications
>
Article

Medical empathy in medical students in Madrid: A proposal for empathy level cut-off points for Spain

Publicated to:PLoS ONE. 17 (5): e0267172-e0267172 - 2022-05-01 17(5), DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267172

Authors: Blanco Canseco JM, Blanco Alfonso A, Caballero Martínez F, Hawkins Solís MM, Fernández Agulló T, Lledó García L, López Román A, Piñas Mesa A, Vara Ameigeiras EM, Monge Martín D

Affiliations

Dean Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad de Alcalá, Madrid, Spain. - Author
Dean School of Medicine, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, Spain. - Author
Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain. - Author
Reina Victoria Healthcare Centre, School of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain. - Author
School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain. - Author
School of Medicine, Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio, Madrid, Spain. - Author
School of Medicine, Universidad CEU San Pablo, Madrid, Spain. - Author
School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain. - Author
School of Medicine, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, Spain. - Author
Univ Alcala, Dean Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Madrid, Spain - Author
Univ Alfonso X El Sabio, Sch Med, Madrid, Spain - Author
Univ Autonoma Madrid, Reina Victoria Healthcare Ctr, Sch Med, Madrid, Spain - Author
Univ CEU San Pablo, Sch Med, Madrid, Spain - Author
Univ Complutense Madrid, Sch Med, Madrid, Spain - Author
Univ Europea Madrid, Sch Biomed & Hlth Sci, Madrid, Spain - Author
Univ Francisco Vitoria, Dean Sch Med, Madrid, Spain - Author
Univ Francisco Vitoria, Sch Med, Madrid, Spain - Author
Univ Rey Juan Carlos, Fac Hlth Sci, Madrid, Spain - Author
Valle de la Oliva Healthcare Centre, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain. - Author
Valle Oliva Healthcare Ctr, Madrid, Spain - Author
See more

Abstract

This study evaluates the degree of empathy among medical students and its influencing factors at three critical moments of their degree studies (beginning of first year and end of third and sixth years) as well as establishes low-, medium-, and high-empathy cut-off points to obtain valid and reliable results that can be extrapolated to the general population. This cross-sectional study of the eight (public and private) medical schools in the province of Madrid, used an electronic questionnaire with the Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE), Medical Student Well-Being Index, and other independent characteristics as measuring instruments. Of the 2,264 student participants, 1,679 (74.0%) were women, with a 50.7% participation rate. No significant differences were found in empathy levels by academic year. Regarding range, percentile and cut-off point tables were established to identify students with high, medium, and low empathy levels. Women (p<0.001), volunteer workers (p<0.001), and those preferring general specialties (internal medicine, psychiatry, pediatrics, or family medicine) scored higher on the JSE (p<0.02). Moreover, 41.6% presented high level of psychological distress. Women reported a lower well-being level and a higher risk of psychological distress (p = 0.004). In sum, the empathy of medical students in Madrid did not differ among the three critical moments of their university studies. The established cut-off points could be taken into account when accessing the medical degree and identifying students with low levels of empathy to implement curricular interventions to rectify this perceived deficiency. There was a high percentage of medical students with high levels of psychological distress.

Keywords

burnoutclinical competencedeclinedepressiondistresseducationgenderjefferson scalespecialtyPhysician empathy

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal PLoS ONE due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency Scopus (SJR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2022, it was in position , thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Multidisciplinary.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from World Citations from Scopus Elsevier, it yields a value for the Field-Weighted Citation Impact from the Scopus agency: 1.11, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: ESI Nov 14, 2024)

This information is reinforced by other indicators of the same type, which, although dynamic over time and dependent on the set of average global citations at the time of their calculation, consistently position the work at some point among the top 50% most cited in its field:

  • Field Citation Ratio (FCR) from Dimensions: 2.82 (source consulted: Dimensions Aug 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-08-14, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 3
  • Scopus: 7

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-08-14:

  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 39 (PlumX).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.
  • Assignment of a Handle/URN as an identifier within the deposit in the Institutional Repository: http://hdl.handle.net/10486/707711