{rfName}
Th

Indexed in

License and use

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Antolin Alvarado EAuthorBartha JlAuthor
Share
Publications
>
Article

Third trimester ultrasound estimated fetal weight for increasing prenatal prediction of small-for-gestational age newborns in low-risk pregnant women

Publicated to:Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 35 (25): 1-6 - 2022-01-01 35(25), DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1920915

Authors: Martin-Palumbo, Giovanna; Atanasova, Vangeliya Blagoeva; Rego Tejeda, Maria Teresa; Antolin Alvarado, Eugenia; Bartha, Jose Luis

Affiliations

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal and Fetal Medicine, University Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain. - Author
Univ Hosp La Paz, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal & Fetal Med, Madrid, Spain - Author

Abstract

The early detection of small-for-gestational age (SGA) fetuses and newborns is pivotal in the prevention of perinatal mortality.To compare the predictive capability of performing ultrasound-based estimated fetal weight (EFW) at 32 versus 36 weeks' gestation on the detection rate of SGA fetuses and SGA newborns at delivery, and to find a better cutoff level to consider a fetus at risk of being born small.Nine hundred fifteen low-risk pregnant women were assessed at both 32 and 36 weeks' gestation. EFW centile was calculated in both occasions. The rate of SGA fetuses was compared. SGA fetuses were considered when both abdominal circumference (AC) and EFW were below the 10th centile from a total of 488 delivered at our Hospital. Paired comparisons between ultrasound at 32 and 36 weeks' gestation were done to predict SGA at delivery. Percentages of SGA fetuses were compared by chi-squared test. ANOVA test was used for comparing centiles among groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to find the best cutoff ultrasound centile to predict SGA at delivery. Statistical significance was previously set at 95% level (p < .05).Ultrasound-based EFW at 32 weeks showed 23 cases of SGA (2.5%) while at 36 weeks this rate increased up to 4% (37/915) (p < .000001). When comparing both outcomes, 2.8% of those catalogued as adequate-for-gestational age (AGA) at 32 weeks were cases of SGA at 36 weeks. In addition, 47.8% of those diagnosed as SGA were not confirmed at 36 weeks. Only 12.3% of SGA neonates were identified at 32 weeks' gestation ultrasound, while using the 36 weeks' gestation approach this rate increased up to 30.9%. So, only a low proportion of SGA neonates were SGA fetuses at any of these two gestational ages. However, the area under the curve (AUC) at 36 weeks was as high as 0.86. Being a matter of cutoff rather than a matter of choosing the correct variable, ROC analysis showed that the best cutoff for prediction having the best sensitivity (0.80) with the best specificity (0.77) was 28th centile of EFW. This represents 24.9% of the studied women (228/915).In general, ultrasound at 36 weeks has better performance detecting SGA fetuses than ultrasound at 32 weeks and we suggest to definitively change from 32 to 36 weeks in order to increase the detection rate of SGA fetuses. Moreover, in order to detect those fetuses who will grow below the lower level of the normal range in the last month of pregnancy, we suggest that those with EFW below the 28th centile at 36 weeks should be rescanned later in pregnancy to identify prenatally as many cases as we can of SGA newborns.

Keywords
Estimated fetal weightFetal riskPerinatal outcomeSmall-for-gestational ageThird trimester ultrasound

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency Scopus (SJR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2022, it was in position , thus managing to position itself as a Q2 (Segundo Cuartil), in the category Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Notably, the journal is positioned en el Cuartil Q4 for the agency WoS (JCR) in the category Obstetrics & Gynecology.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from World Citations provided by WoS (ESI, Clarivate), it yields a value for the citation normalization relative to the expected citation rate of: 1.61. This indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: ESI Nov 14, 2024)

This information is reinforced by other indicators of the same type, which, although dynamic over time and dependent on the set of average global citations at the time of their calculation, consistently position the work at some point among the top 50% most cited in its field:

  • Weighted Average of Normalized Impact by the Scopus agency: 1.03 (source consulted: FECYT Feb 2024)
  • Field Citation Ratio (FCR) from Dimensions: 2.26 (source consulted: Dimensions May 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-05-19, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 4
  • Scopus: 3
  • Europe PMC: 2
  • OpenCitations: 5
Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-05-19:

  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 22 (PlumX).
Leadership analysis of institutional authors

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: Last Author (BARTHA RASERO, JOSE LUIS).