{rfName}
Tr

Indexed in

License and use

Icono OpenAccess

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Fuentes, BAuthorDiez-Tejedor, EAuthor

Share

November 29, 2021
Publications
>
Review

Transient Focal Neurological Events in Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy and the Long-term Risk of Intracerebral Hemorrhage and Death A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Publicated to:JAMA Neurology. 79 (1): 38-47 - 2022-01-01 79(1), DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.3989

Authors: Maria Sanchez-Caro, Juan; Martinez de Ubago, Inigo de Lorenzo; de Celis Ruiz, Elena; Barguilla Arribas, Ainara; Calviere, Lionel; Raposo, Nicolas; Galiano Blancart, Rafael; Fuentes, Blanca; Diez-Tejedor, Exuperio; Rodriguez-Pardo, Jorge;

Affiliations

Ctr Hosp Univ Toulouse, Neurol Dept, Hop Pierre Paul Riquet, Toulouse, France - Author
Hosp Mar, Dept Neurol, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Univ Autonoma Madrid, Dept Neurol, La Paz Univ Hosp, Hosp La Paz,Inst Hlth Res IdiPAZ, Paseo Castellana 261, Madrid 28046, Spain - Author
Univ Toulouse, Toulouse NeuroImaging Ctr, Ups, Inserm, Toulouse, France - Author
Univ Valencia, Doctor Peset Univ Hosp, Dept Neurol, Valencia, Spain - Author
See more

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Transient focal neurological episodes (TFNEs) are a frequently overlooked presentation of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), a condition with prognostic implications that are still not well described.OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the factors associated with incident lobar intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and death in patients with CAA presenting with TFNEs.DATA SOURCES A systematic review and individual participant meta-analysis including (1) a hospital-based cohort and (2) the results obtained from a systematic search performed in MEDLINE and Embase completed in December 2019.STUDY SELECTION Included studies were observational reports of TFNEs. Patient-level clinical, imaging, and prognostic data were required for inclusion. For aggregate data studies, patient-level data were requested. Disagreements were resolved by consensus.DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Data were extracted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines by 4 independent reviewers. The quality of reports was determined based on the modified Pearson Case Report Quality Scale.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The clinical characteristics of TFNEs, neuroimaging features, and use of antithrombotics during follow-up were considered exposures. The predefined main outcomes were lobar ICH and risk of death during follow-up.RESULTS Forty-two studies and 222 CAA-associated TFNE cases were included from the initial 1612 records produced by the systematic search; 26 additional patients (11 men [42.3%]; mean [SD] age, 77 [8] years) were provided by the hospital-based cohort. A total of 108 TFNEs (43.5%) consisted of motor symptoms. Convexity subarachnoid hemorrhage and cortical superficial siderosis were detected in 193 individuals (77.8%) and 156 individuals (62.9%) in the systematic search and hospital-based cohort, respectively. Follow-up duration could be obtained in 185 patients (median duration, 1 year [IQR, 0.8-2.5 years]). During follow-up, symptomatic lobar ICH occurred in 76 patients (39.4%). Motor symptoms (odds ratio, 2.08 [95% CI, 1.16-3.70]) at baseline and antithrombotic use during follow-up (odds ratio, 3.61 [95% CI, 1.67-7.84]) were associated with an increase in risk of lobar ICH. A total of 31 patients (16.5%) died during follow-up; lobar ICH during follow-up and cortical superficial siderosis were the main risk factors for death (odds ratio, 3.01 [95% CI, 1.36-6.69]; odds ratio, 3.20 [95% CI, 1.16-8.91], respectively).CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Patients presenting with CAA-associated TFNEs are at high risk of lobar ICH and death. Motor TFNEs and use of antithrombotics after a TFNE, in many cases because of misdiagnosis, are risk factors for ICH, and therefore accurate diagnosis and distinguishing this condition from transient ischemic attacks is critical.

Keywords

Convexity subarachnoid hemorrhageDiagnosisEpisodesFeaturesPatientSeriesSpectrumSpellsSuperficial siderosis

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal JAMA Neurology due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2022, it was in position 3/212, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Clinical Neurology. Notably, the journal is positioned above the 90th percentile.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from World Citations provided by WoS (ESI, Clarivate), it yields a value for the citation normalization relative to the expected citation rate of: 4.11. This indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: ESI Nov 14, 2024)

This information is reinforced by other indicators of the same type, which, although dynamic over time and dependent on the set of average global citations at the time of their calculation, consistently position the work at some point among the top 50% most cited in its field:

  • Weighted Average of Normalized Impact by the Scopus agency: 3.66 (source consulted: FECYT Feb 2024)
  • Field Citation Ratio (FCR) from Dimensions: 12.38 (source consulted: Dimensions Aug 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-08-02, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 13
  • Scopus: 15

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-08-02:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 41.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 43 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 52.7.
  • The number of mentions on the social network Facebook: 1 (Altmetric).
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 43 (Altmetric).
  • The number of mentions in news outlets: 4 (Altmetric).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

This work has been carried out with international collaboration, specifically with researchers from: France.

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: First Author (Sanchez-Caro, JM) and Last Author (Rodríguez-Pardo, J).

the author responsible for correspondence tasks has been Rodríguez-Pardo, J.