{rfName}
Lo

License and use

Icono OpenAccess

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Moreno-Jiménez JeAuthorRodríguez-Carvajal RCorresponding AuthorGarcía-Rubio CAuthorCastillo-Gualda R.AuthorMontero I.Author

Share

June 28, 2021
Publications
>
Article

Long-term effectiveness of a mindfulness based intervention (MBI) program for stuttering: a case study

Publicated to:Clinica y Salud. 32 (2): 55-63 - 2021-07-01 32(2), DOI: 10.5093/CLYSA2021A1

Authors: Moreno Jiménez, Jennifer E; Rodríguez Carvajal, Raquel; García-Rubio, Carlos; Castillo Gualda, Ruth; Montero García-Celay, Ignacio

Affiliations

Univ Autonoma Madrid, Madrid, Spain - Author
Univ Camilo Jose Cela, Madrid, Spain - Author
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid - Author
Universidad Camilo Jose Cela - Author

Abstract

A mindfulness-based intervention (MBI) to address emotional factors that may negatively impact the fluency of the subjects was implemented. A MBI consisting of 5 weekly 2-h sessions was designed and applied to two stuttering cases. The goals were to lower stuttering and to reduce anxiety through the acquisition of mindfulness skills. Participants were asked to video-record a speaking task and to fill out anxiety and mindfulness skills self-reports pre and post-intervention. Both participants diminished stuttering error rates from severe (participant 1) and moderate (participant 2) to mild. Participant 2, who showed high pre-treatment anxiety, showed a significant reduction. A year-follow-up revealed that therapeutic gains in anxiety, mindfulness skills, and stuttering were successfully maintained in both participants. This is the first study focused on emotional aspects of stuttering showing long-term improvements through a MBI. MBI programs could serve as a promising complement for stuttering treatments.

Keywords

acceptanceadultscase studychildrenlong-term effectivenessmattermeditationmindfulnessmindfulness-based interventionmodelselfCase studyCommitment therapyLong-term effectivenessMindfulnessMindfulness-based interventionStuttering

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Clinica y Salud due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency Dialnet (Dialnet Métricas). In the year of publication of the work, 2021, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil).

Notably, the journal is positioned in the Quartile Q3 for the agency WoS (JCR), in the category Psychology, Clinical, in the Quartile Q3 for the agency Scopus (SJR), in the category Clinical Psychology, classified as A in other national agencies such as CIRC, classified as D by the agency AGUAR.

Desde una perspectiva relativa, los impactos normalizados en entornos vinculados a las áreas de humanidades y ciencias sociales dentro del contexto nacional, este trabajo consigue un valor de citación normalizada, calculado a partir de los datos proporcionados por Dialnet Métricas, de: 1.33, lo que indica que, de manera comparada con trabajos en la misma disciplina y en el mismo año de publicación, lo ubica como trabajo citado por encima de la media al menos en el contexto nacional. (source consulted: Dialnet Metrics Dec 2023)

Según las diferentes agencias de indexación, el número de citas acumuladas por esta publicación hasta la fecha 2025-08-03:

  • Dialnet Métricas: 1
  • WoS: 1
  • Scopus: 3

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-08-03:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 80.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 215 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 1.85.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 3 (Altmetric).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.
  • Additionally, the work has been submitted to a journal classified as Diamond in relation to this type of editorial policy.
  • Assignment of a Handle/URN as an identifier within the deposit in the Institutional Repository: https://repositorio.uam.es/handle/10486/697581

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: First Author (MORENO JIMENEZ, JENNIFER ELENA) and Last Author (MONTERO GARCIA-CELAY, IGNACIO).

the author responsible for correspondence tasks has been RODRIGUEZ CARVAJAL, RAQUEL.