{rfName}
In

Indexed in

License and use

Citations

6

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

De Miguel Mendieta, EugenioAuthor

Share

Publications
>
Article

Interobserver reliability of Masei index validation by a multicenter collaborative group of rheumatologists

Publicated to:RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL. 42 (3): 441-448 - 2022-01-01 42(3), DOI: 10.1007/s00296-020-04733-y

Authors: Moya Alvarado, Patricia; de Agustin de Oro, Juan Jose; Aparicio Espinar, Maria; Armengol Perez, Eulalia; Busquets Perez, Noemi; Carmona, Loreto; Casado Burgos, Enrique; Clavaguera Poch, Teresa; Cuervo Aguilera, Andrea; De Miguel Mendieta, Eugenio; Estrada Alarcon, Paula; Garcia Casares, Elisabet; Holgado Perez, Susana; Magallares Lopez, Berta; Martinez Morillo, Melania; Mateo Soria, Lourdes; Moragues Pastor, Carmen; Moreno Martinez-Losa, Mireia; Ponce Fernandez, Andres; Pujol Busquets, Manel; Ramirez Garcia, Julio; Reina Sanz, Delia; Salles Lizarzaburu, Meritxell; Santo Panero, Pilar; Sirvent Alierta, Elena; Valls Roc, Marta; Corominas Macias, Hector;

Affiliations

Abstract

Keywords

interobserver reliabilitymaseispondyloarthropathyUltrasound

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2022, it was in position 16/34, thus managing to position itself as a Q2 (Segundo Cuartil), in the category Rheumatology. Notably, the journal is positioned en el Cuartil Q2 para la agencia Scopus (SJR) en la categoría Rheumatology.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from the Field Citation Ratio (FCR) of the Dimensions source, it yields a value of: 2.01, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: Dimensions Jul 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-07-01, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 2
  • Scopus: 4

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-07-01:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 16.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 16 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 3.45.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 6 (Altmetric).