{rfName}
Ra

Indexed in

License and use

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Caballero Sanchez-Robles, Maria PalomaAuthorSuarez Fernandez, M CarmenAuthorPérez-Amor EAuthor

Share

Publications
>
Article

Rapid D-dimer test combined a clinical model for deep vein thrombosis. Validation with ultrasonography and clinical follow-up in 383 patients

Publicated to:THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS. 91 (6): 1237-1246 - 2004-01-01 91(6), DOI: 10.1160/TH03-02-0080

Authors: Ruiz-Giménez Arrieta N; Friera A; Artieda P; Caballero P; Sanchez Moliní P; Morales M; Suárez C; Domínguez L; Pérez-Amor E; Roldán J

Affiliations

Hospital Universitario de la Princesa - Author
Internal Medicine Service, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain. airunruizg@hotmail.com - Author
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid - Author

Abstract

An optimal approach to the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in lower limbs in the emergency department is still unknown. In this prospective cohort study, we aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the widely available plasma D-dimer test (VIDAS) and establish the usefulness of combining D-dimer testing with a clinical model to reduce the need for serial ultrasonographies and improve the diagnostic strategy of DVT. We performed a cohort study in 383 consecutive outpatients referred to the emergency department of Hospital La Princesa, with clinical suspicion of DVT. The patients were stratified into three pre-test probability categories using an explicit clinical model (Wells score), and underwent a quantitative automated ELISA D-dimer assay (VIDAS D-Dimer® bioMérieux). Patients were managed according to the diagnostic strategy based on clinical probability and compression ultrasonography (CU). Patients for whom DVT was considered a high pre-test probability with negative ultrasonographic findings in the initial CU, returned the following week for repeat ultrasonography. All patients with DVT excluded did not receive anticoagulant therapy, and were followed up for three months to monitor the development of venous thromboembolic complications. DVT was confirmed in 102 patients (26.6%):95 in the initial test, four in the second test, and three who developed venous thromboembolic complications in the three-month follow-up period. The calculated D-dimer cut-off level was 1 μg/ml. One hundred patients (98%) with DVT had positive D-dimer. D-dimer had a sensitivity of 98% and a negative predictive value of 98.6%. Among the high-probability patients with positive D-dimer tests and initial negative CU, 9.75% had DVT on repeat CU at one week. The study results suggest that the addition of VIDAS D-dimer to this diagnostic algorithm could improve the management of patients with suspected DVT in daily practice. A diagnostic approach of DVT based on D-dimer (cut-off ≥1 μg/ml) as the first diagnostic tool for the exclusion of DVT, and the clinical probability model as the tool that identifies those patients requiring a second ultrasonography is useful and suitable for daily medical practice. © 2004 Schattauer GmbH, Stuttgart.

Keywords

Clinical modelD-dimerDeep vein thrombosisDiagnosisEmergency

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2004, it was in position 12/51, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Peripheral Vascular Disease.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from the Field Citation Ratio (FCR) of the Dimensions source, it yields a value of: 4.95, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: Dimensions Jun 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-06-19, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 20
  • Scopus: 27
  • Europe PMC: 11
  • OpenCitations: 22

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-06-19:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 17.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 20 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 6.