{rfName}
Di

License and use

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Juan José Díez GómezAuthorCristina álvarez EscoláAuthorBeatriz Lecumberri SantamaríaAuthor

Share

September 2, 2020
Publications
>
Article
No

Diagnóstico y tratamiento del nódulo tiroideo en España. Resultados de una encuesta nacional

Publicated to:Endocrinologia Diabetes y Nutricion. 67 (7): 438-445 - 2020-08-01 67(7), DOI: 10.1016/j.endinu.2019.10.003

Authors: Gómez Pérez, Ana; Fernández García, José Carlos; Iglesias Lozano, Pedro; Díez Gómez, Juan José; Álvarez Escolá, Cristina; Lecumberri Santamaría, Beatriz; Lucas Martín, Anna M; Donnay Candil, Sergio; Cabrejas Gómez, Carmen; Menéndez Torre, Edelmiro; Galofré Ferrater, Juan Carlos

Affiliations

Clínica Universitaria de Navarra - Author
Fundación Hospital Alcorcón - Author
Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa - Author
Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol - Author
Hospital Universitari Virgen de la Victoria - Author
Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias - Author
Hospital Universitario La Paz - Author
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro - Author
See more

Abstract

Introducción El nódulo tiroideo (NT) es un motivo de consulta frecuente en la práctica diaria. El objetivo de este estudio es conocer el proceso diagnóstico y terapéutico del NT en nuestro medio y evaluar el estado actual sobre la existencia y estructura de las consultas de alta resolución de NT.

Keywords

diagnosis managementecografíaencuestamanejo diagnósticonódulo tiroideosurveythyroid noduleAssociationCancerClinical-practiceDiagnosis managementEndocrinologyGuidelinesManagementSurveySystemThyroid noduleUltrasonographyUltrasound

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Endocrinologia Diabetes y Nutricion, and although the journal is classified in the quartile Q4 (Agencia WoS (JCR)), its regional focus and specialization in Endocrinology & Metabolism, give it significant recognition in a specific niche of scientific knowledge at an international level.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from the Field Citation Ratio (FCR) of the Dimensions source, it yields a value of: 1.43, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: Dimensions Jul 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-07-16, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 1
  • Scopus: 6

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-07-16:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 31.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 57 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 4.7.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 8 (Altmetric).