{rfName}
La

Indexed in

License and use

Citations

7

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Isabel Polanco AlluéAuthor

Share

July 2, 2020
Publications
>
Article
No

La introducción del gluten en la dieta del lactante. Recomendaciones de un grupo de expertos

Publicated to:Anales de Pediatria Continuada. 83 (5): 355-355 - 2015-01-01 83(5), DOI: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2015.03.009

Authors: Carmen Ribes Koninckx; Jaime Dalmau Serra; José Manuel Moreno Villares; Juan José Díaz Martín; G Castillejo de Villasante; Isabel Polanco Allué

Affiliations

Hospital Universitari I Politècnic la Fe - Author
Hospital Universitari La Fe i Politecnic Valencia - Author
Hospital Universitario 12 de octubre - Author
Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias - Author
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid - Author
University Hospital Sant Joan de Reus - Author
See more

Abstract

En el momento actual existe una situación de indefinición con respecto a cuándo, cómo y de qué forma debe introducirse el gluten en la dieta del lactante. Durante años ha prevalecido la recomendación del Comité de Nutrición de la ESPGHAN de evitar tanto la introducción precoz, antes de los 4 meses, como la tardía, después de los 7 meses, y de introducir el gluten gradualmente mientras el lactante recibe leche materna; se pretendía con ello reducir el riesgo de enfermedad celiaca, diabetes y alergia al gluten. Sin embargo, 2 estudios independientes publicados en octubre de 2014 en The New England Journal of Medicine llegan a la conclusión de que la edad de introducción del gluten no modifica el riesgo de desarrollar la enfermedad celiaca y que la lactancia materna a cualquier edad tampoco confiere protección.

Keywords

gluteninfantintroducciónintroductionGlutenInfantIntroducciónIntroductionLactante

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Anales de Pediatria Continuada, Q4 Agency Scopus (SJR), its regional focus and specialization in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, give it significant recognition in a specific niche of scientific knowledge at an international level.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from the Field Citation Ratio (FCR) of the Dimensions source, it yields a value of: 1.04, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: Dimensions Jul 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-07-07, the following number of citations:

  • Scopus: 5

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-07-07:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 73.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 78 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 4.5.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 7 (Altmetric).

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: Last Author (POLANCO ALLUE, MARIA ISABEL).