{rfName}
On

Indexed in

License and use

Citations

7

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Sanchez Castillo, AdrianAuthor

Share

Publications
>
Review

One hundred years since the Bolshevik Triennium (1918-1920): Agrarian unionism and collective actions during the restoration crisis

Publicated to:Hispania Nova. Revista de Historia Contemporánea. (18): 116-146 - 2020-01-01 (18), DOI: 10.20318/hn.2020.5101

Authors: Sánchez Castillo, Adrián

Affiliations

Universidad Autónoma de Madrid - Author

Abstract

Copyright: © HISPANIA NOVA es una revista debidamente registrada, con ISSN 1138-7319 y Depósito Legal M 9472-1998. Los textos publicados en esta revista están -si no se indica lo contrario- bajo una licencia Reconocimiento-Sin obras derivadas 3.0 España de Creative Commons. Puede copiarlos, distribuirlos y comunicarlos públicamente siempre que cite su autor y la revista y la institución que los publica y no haga con ellos obras derivadas. La licencia completa se puede consultar en: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/es/deed.es Agrarian conflicts that erupted from 1918 to 1920 in rural Spain, with an epicentre in Andalusia and namely in the province of Cordoba, went down in history as the Bolshevik Triennium. This term, coined by Juan Díaz del Moral in his classic Historia de las agitaciones campesinas andaluzas (1929) encompasses a strike offensive led by thousands of day labourers, tenants and small landowners unparalleled in the contemporary history of Spain. This work aims to analyse that conflict as a collective action phenomenon, framing it in the national and international political context, identifying its time, regional and sectoral discontinuity, as well as contributing to the updating of historiography on that topic as we celebrate one hundred years since those events took place.

Keywords

Agrarian historyAgrarian unionismBolshevik trienniumCollective actionRestorationWorkers' movement

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Hispania Nova. Revista de Historia Contemporánea due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency Scopus (SJR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2020, it was in position , thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category History.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from World Citations provided by WoS (ESI, Clarivate), it yields a value for the citation normalization relative to the expected citation rate of: 3.03. This indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: ESI Nov 14, 2024)

This information is reinforced by other indicators of the same type, which, although dynamic over time and dependent on the set of average global citations at the time of their calculation, consistently position the work at some point among the top 50% most cited in its field:

  • Weighted Average of Normalized Impact by the Scopus agency: 2 (source consulted: FECYT Feb 2024)
  • Field Citation Ratio (FCR) from Dimensions: 2.01 (source consulted: Dimensions Jun 2025)
  • Normalized Impact calculated by Dialnet Metrics: 8.7 (source consulted: Dialnet Metrics Dec 2023)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-06-13, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 2
  • Scopus: 3
  • OpenCitations: 1

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-06-13:

  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 2 (PlumX).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.
  • Assignment of a Handle/URN as an identifier within the deposit in the Institutional Repository: https://repositorio.uam.es/handle/10486/704593

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: First Author (SANCHEZ CASTILLO, ADRIAN) and Last Author (SANCHEZ CASTILLO, ADRIAN).