Publications
>
Article

Estudio comparativo de los formatos en lápiz y papel y electrónicos de los cuestionarios GHQ-12, WHO-5 y PHQ-9

Publicated to:Revista De Psiquiatría Y Salud Mental. 10 (3): 160-167 - 2017-01-01 10(3), DOI: 10.1016/j.rpsm.2016.12.002

Authors: Barrigón, María L; Rico Romano, Ana María; Ruiz Gómez, Marta; Delgado Gómez, David; Barahona Torres, Igor; Aroca Bisquert, Fuensanta; Baca García, Enrique

Affiliations

Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red de Salud Mental - Author
Columbia University - Author
Hospital Universitario Fundacion Jimenez Diaz - Author
Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor - Author
Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos - Author
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid - Author
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid - Author
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México - Author
See more

Abstract

Introducción El auge de la telemedicina en el campo de la salud mental está haciendo que el uso de instrumentos psicométricos, tradicionalmente basados en un soporte de «lápiz-y-papel», se adapte al formato electrónico. El objetivo de este trabajo es verificar si los 2 formatos de conocidos instrumentos como las escalas GHQ-12, WHO-5 y PHQ-9 son intercambiables.

Keywords
fiabilidadghq-12phq-9psicometríapsychometricsreliabilityGhq-12Phq-9PsychometricsReliabilityWho-5

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Revista De Psiquiatría Y Salud Mental due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2017, it was in position 58/142, thus managing to position itself as a Q2 (Segundo Cuartil), in the category Psychiatry. Notably, the journal is positioned en el Cuartil Q2 para la agencia Scopus (SJR) en la categoría Psychiatry and Mental Health.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from the Field Citation Ratio (FCR) of the Dimensions source, it yields a value of: 4.46, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: Dimensions May 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-05-19, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 16
  • Scopus: 21
  • Google Scholar: 31
  • OpenCitations: 16
Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-05-19:

  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 65 (PlumX).
Leadership analysis of institutional authors

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: First Author (BARRIGON ESTEVEZ, MARIA LUISA) and Last Author (BACA GARCIA, ENRIQUE).

the author responsible for correspondence tasks has been BACA GARCIA, ENRIQUE.