{rfName}
Di

Indexed in

License and use

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Rodríguez Salas NAuthor

Share

April 23, 2019
Publications
>
Article
No

Diagnosis and Treatment of Merkel Cell Carcinoma in Specialized Dermatology Units: A Clinical Practice Guideline of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology

Publicated to:Actas Dermo-Sifiliograficas. 110 (6): 460-468 - 2019-07-01 110(6), DOI: 10.1016/j.ad.2019.01.006

Authors: Vázquez Doval J; Llombart Cussac B; Pérez Bustillo A; Paradela de la Morena S; Fuente González M; Fernández Figueras M; Villanueva M; Rodríguez Salas N; Descalzo-Gallego M; García-Doval I; Ríos-Buceta L

Affiliations

Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León - Author
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Juan Canalejo - Author
Dermaclinic - Author
Fundación Piel Sana Academia Española de Dermatología y Venereología - Author
Hospital Ramón y Cajal - Author
Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol - Author
Hospital Universitario La Paz - Author
Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia - Author
Universidad de Vigo - Author
See more

Abstract

© 2019 AEDV Background and objective: Merkel cell carcinoma is a rare, aggressive skin cancer that is managed in a great variety of ways. However, international clinical practice guidelines give only partial coverage to issues considered major problems.The recommendations presented here aim to provide Spanish dermatologists with a guide to improving disputed aspects of diagnosis, staging, and treatment of localized Merkel cell carcinomas. Material and methods: The ADAPTE process was used. Members of the Spanish Group of Oncologic Dermatology and Surgery (GEDOC) with experience in treating Merkel cell carcinoma and interest in drafting these guidelines were selected. The group described the care process and listed the most important clinical questions. They then searched for guidelines and assessed them with the AGREE II (Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation) tool. After consulting the guidelines for answers to their clinical questions, the group drafted the present statementand sent it for external review. Results: The guidelines that scored highest in the AGREE II assessment step were the consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline of the European Association of Dermato-Oncology and the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer, and those of the Comprehensive Cancer Network, the Alberta Health Services in Canada, the American Cancer Society, and the Cutaneous Oncology Group of the French Society of Dermatology. A total of 9 clinical questions were answered based on these guidelines. Conclusions: The guidelines presented here answer clinical questions that arise in routine practice. They can provide dermatologists with a starting point for decision-making, although available resources and patient preferences must always be borne in mind.

Keywords

carcinoma de células de merkelclinical practice guidelinesevidence-based medicineguía de práctica clínicamedicina basada en la evidenciamerkel cell carcinomaneoplasias de pielskin neoplasmsterapiaBiopsyClinical practice guidelinesEvidence-based medicineExperienceLymph-node metastasisManagementMerkel cell carcinomaMetaanalysisPositron-emission-tomographyPrognostic-factorsRadiation-therapySkin neoplasmsSurvivalTherapyUpdate

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Actas Dermo-Sifiliograficas, Q3 Agency Scopus (SJR), its regional focus and specialization in Dermatology, give it significant recognition in a specific niche of scientific knowledge at an international level.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from the Field Citation Ratio (FCR) of the Dimensions source, it yields a value of: 1.72, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: Dimensions Jul 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-07-16, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 5
  • Scopus: 7

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-07-16:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 18.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 26 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 0.5.
  • The number of mentions on the social network Facebook: 1 (Altmetric).
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 1 (Altmetric).