{rfName}
Ut

License and use

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Fontanilla Echeveste TAuthor

Share

February 24, 2017
Publications
>
Article
No

Utilidad de la ecografía con contraste en la práctica clínica diaria: estudio multicéntrico español CEUS

Publicated to:Radiologia. 52 (2): 144-152 - 2010-01-01 52(2), DOI: 10.1016/j.rx.2009.11.005

Authors: Nicolau Molina C., Fontanilla Echeveste T., Del Cura RodrígueZ. J., Cruz Villalón F., Ripollés GonzáleZ. T., Baudet NaveroS. B., Velasco MarcoS. M., Garre SáncheZ. C., Huertas ArroyO. R., Hernández García L., Pitti ReyeS. S., Gómez RodrígueZ. R., Calvo LópeZ. M., Maroto Genover A., Álvarez BustoS. G., Poch Zatarain M., Talegón MeléndeZ. Y.

Affiliations

Hospital Clinic Barcelona - Author
Hospital de Basurto - Author
HOSPITAL DE LEÓN - Author
Hospital Donostia - Author
Hospital La Mancha - Author
Hospital Ntra. Sra. C and Elaria - Author
Hospital Regional Universitario Carlos Haya - Author
Hospital Universitari de Girona Dr. Josep Trueta - Author
Hospital Universitario de Canarias - Author
Hospital Universitario Dr. Peset - Author
Hospital Universitario Pio del Rio Hortega - Author
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro - Author
Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar - Author
Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía - Author
HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO VIRGEN DEL ROCIO - Author
Hospital Virgen de la Arri-xaca - Author
Hospital Virgendela Salud - Author
See more

Abstract

We aimed to determine whether the use of ultrasonographic contrast agents improves the diagnostic performance of ultrasonography (US).We carried out a prospective multicenter study in 42 hospitals. We included 1786 patients with inconclusive US; 84.9% of the inconclusive studies were abdominal US (including studies of the liver, kidneys, spleen, and other sites), 6.2% were studies of the peripheral vessels, 4.3% were breast studies, and 4.6% were other studies. We evaluated the type of contrast-enhanced US (color Doppler or contrast-specific method), type of contrast agent, dose and number of doses, and type of administration (bolus or infusion). We evaluated whether the findings at contrast-enhanced US improved the diagnostic performance of unenhanced US and whether they enabled a conclusive diagnosis to be reached.The contrast agent SonoVue was used in 99.9% of the studies; a single dose of contrast agent was used in 84.8%, and the contrast agent was administered in bolus in 98.5%. Contrast-enhanced US improved the diagnostic performance in 91.6% of cases and enabled the conclusive diagnosis in 69.2%. The best diagnostic performance was obtained in the supraaortic trunks, where a definitive diagnosis was reached in 95.4% of cases, followed by the abdominal area, with a conclusive diagnosis in 72.6% of cases.The use of contrast-enhanced US significantly improved the diagnostic performance of US and enabled a conclusive diagnosis in most cases.Copyright 2009 SERAM. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.

Keywords

Contrast agents.Contrast-enhanced ultrasonographyUltrasonography

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Radiologia, Q4 Agency Scopus (SJR), its regional focus and specialization in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, give it significant recognition in a specific niche of scientific knowledge at an international level.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from the Field Citation Ratio (FCR) of the Dimensions source, it yields a value of: 2.26, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: Dimensions Aug 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-08-07, the following number of citations:

  • Scopus: 12
  • Europe PMC: 6

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-08-07:

  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 25 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as: