{rfName}
Co

Indexed in

License and use

Citations

Altmetrics

Grant support

This research has received the Rafael Burgaleta Award "Clinical Psychology Area", XXIX edition (2022), granted by the Colegio Oficial de la Psicologia de Madrid.

Analysis of institutional authors

Fernandez-Regueras, DiegoAuthorLuque-Gonzalez, AlbaAuthorCristina Guerrero-Escagedo, MAuthorCalero-Elvira, AnaCorresponding Author
Share
Publications
>
Article

Compliance with Clinical Supervision Guidelines and its Relations with Confidence of the Supervisees

Publicated to:Clinica y Salud. 34 (3): 117-121 - 2023-09-14 34(3), DOI: 10.5093/clysa2023a10

Authors: Fernandez-Regueras, Diego; Luque-Gonzalez, Alba; Cristina Guerrero-Escagedo, M; Calero-Elvira, Ana

Affiliations

Univ Autonoma Madrid, Madrid, Spain - Author

Abstract

Background: Clinical supervision is a procedure for the training of health psychologists based on the guidance of more expert professionals, who provide guidelines for action. Using observational methodology, the aim of this paper is to study compliance with the guidelines and probably related variables, such as the confidence of the therapists with supervision and its methods. Method: Six novice therapists, seven supervisors, and 31 users participated in the study; all of them belonged to the university clinic of the Universidad Autonoma de Madrid (CPA-UAM). Confidence was assessed using a self-report questionnaire and compliance with the guidelines using an observational rating-scale. Results: The most common method of supervision was discussion; confidence with supervision and its methods were associated with greater compliance with the guidelines. Conclusions: The results of this study open the door to the development of a guide for action for supervisors, helping them in their task.

Keywords

Quality index

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-05-13:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 5.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 5 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 1.35.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 2 (Altmetric).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.
  • Additionally, the work has been submitted to a journal classified as Diamond in relation to this type of editorial policy.
  • Assignment of a Handle/URN as an identifier within the deposit in the Institutional Repository: http://hdl.handle.net/10486/710341
Leadership analysis of institutional authors

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: First Author (FERNANDEZ REGUERAS, DIEGO) and Last Author (CALERO ELVIRA, ANA).

the author responsible for correspondence tasks has been CALERO ELVIRA, ANA.