{rfName}
δ

Indexed in

License and use

Citations

21

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Velasco-Rodríguez, DiegoCorresponding Author
Share
Publications
>
Article

δβ-Thalassemia Trait How Can We Discriminate It From β-Thalassemia Trait and Iron Deficiency Anemia?

Publicated to:AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY. 142 (4): 567-573 - 2014-10-01 142(4), DOI: 10.1309/AJCPPBQ8UB1WHXTS

Authors: Velasco-Rodriguez, Diego; Alonso-Dominguez, Juan-Manuel; Gonzalez-Fernandez, Fernando-Ataulfo; Villarrubia, Jesus; Ropero, Paloma; Martinez-Nieto, Jorge; de la Fuente, Felix; Guillen, Raquel; Acedo, Natalia; Seri, Cristina; Cava, Fernando

Affiliations

Hosp Clin San Carlos, Madrid, Spain - Author
Lab Cent Comunidad Madrid, Madrid, Spain - Author

Abstract

Objectives: To analyze the differences not only in classic hematologic parameters but also in RBC subpopulations among beta-thalassemia trait (delta beta-TT), beta-thalassemia trait (delta beta-TT), and iron deficiency anemia (IDA) and to evaluate the role offetal hemoglobin (HbF) in elevated RBC distribution width (RDW). Methods: Samples from 553 patients with micro cytosis (74 6I3-T2 272 fi-TT, and 207 IDA) were run on an Advia 2120i analyzer (Siemens Medical Solutions Diagnostics, Tarrytown, N)9. Classic hematologic parameters and RBC subpopulations were assessed The correlation between IMF and RDW in patients with thalassemia moth /I and 48) was evaluated An independent sample t test was used to compare classic hematologic parameters and RBC subpopulations among fl-TT IDA, and 6,8-TT and receiver operating characteristic curves performed in the significant comparisons. Results: RDW was significantly higher in 5,8-TT compared with fl-TT (18.79% vs 16.04%, P

Keywords

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from the Field Citation Ratio (FCR) of the Dimensions source, it yields a value of: 3.33, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: Dimensions Apr 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-04-24, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 9
  • Scopus: 12
  • OpenCitations: 9
Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-04-24:

  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 40 (PlumX).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.
Leadership analysis of institutional authors

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: First Author (VELASCO RODRIGUEZ, DIEGO) .

the author responsible for correspondence tasks has been VELASCO RODRIGUEZ, DIEGO.