{rfName}
Do

License and Use

Icono OpenAccess

Citations

2084

Altmetrics

Impact on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Analysis of institutional authors

Martinez D.Author

Share

September 4, 2024
Publications
>
Article

Does physical activity attenuate, or even eliminate, the detrimental association of sitting time with mortality? A harmonised meta-analysis of data from more than 1 million men and women

Publicated to: LANCET. 388 (10051): 1302-1310 - 2016-09-24 388(10051), DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30370-1

Authors:

Ekelund U; Steene-Johannessen J; Brown WJ; Fagerland MW; Owen N; Powell KE; Bauman A; Lee IM; Ding D; Heath G; Hallal PC; Kohl HW; Pratt M; Reis R; Sallis J; Aadahl M; Blot WJ; Chey T; Deka A; Dunstan D; Ford ES; Færch K; Inoue M; Katzmarzyk PT; Keadle SK; Matthews CE; Martinez D; Patel AV; Pavey T; Petersen CB; Van Der Ploeg H; Rangul V; Sethi P; Sund ER; Westgate K; Wijndaele K; Yi-Park S
[+]

Affiliations

American Cancer Society - Author
Amsterdam UMC - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam - Author
Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute - Author
Emory University - Author
Harvard Medical School; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health - Author
Københavns Universitet - Author
National Cancer Center Japan - Author
National Cancer Institute (NCI) - Author
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion - Author
Nord universitet - Author
Norges idrettshøgskole - Author
Norges Idrettshøgskole; Oslo Universitetssykehus - Author
Norges Idrettshøgskole; University of Cambridge; Norges Idrettshøgskole - Author
Pennington Biomedical Research Center - Author
Statens Institut for Folkesundhed - Author
Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen - Author
The University of Queensland - Author
The University of Sydney School of Public Health - Author
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid - Author
Universidade Federal de Pelotas - Author
University of California, San Diego - Author
University of Cambridge - Author
University of Hawaiʻi Cancer Center - Author
University of Tennessee at Chattanooga - Author
University of Texas School of Public Health - Author
Vanderbilt University Medical Center - Author
Washington University in St. Louis; Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná - Author
See more

Abstract

Background High amounts of sedentary behaviour have been associated with increased risks of several chronic conditions and mortality. However, it is unclear whether physical activity attenuates or even eliminates the detrimental effects of prolonged sitting. We examined the associations of sedentary behaviour and physical activity with all-cause mortality. Methods We did a systematic review, searching six databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, Web of Science, Sport Discus, and Scopus) from database inception until October, 2015, for prospective cohort studies that had individual level exposure and outcome data, provided data on both daily sitting or TV-viewing time and physical activity, and reported effect estimates for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease mortality, or breast, colon, and colorectal cancer mortality. We included data from 16 studies, of which 14 were identified through a systematic review and two were additional unpublished studies where pertinent data were available. All study data were analysed according to a harmonised protocol, which categorised reported daily sitting time and TV-viewing time into four standardised groups each, and physical activity into quartiles (in metabolic equivalent of task [MET]-hours per week). We then combined data across all studies to analyse the association of daily sitting time and physical activity with all-cause mortality, and estimated summary hazard ratios using Cox regression. We repeated these analyses using TV-viewing time instead of daily sitting time. Findings Of the 16 studies included in the meta-analysis, 13 studies provided data on sitting time and all-cause mortality. These studies included 1 005 791 individuals who were followed up for 2–18·1 years, during which 84 609 (8·4%) died. Compared with the referent group (ie, those sitting <4 h/day and in the most active quartile [>35·5 MET-h per week]), mortality rates during follow-up were 12–59% higher in the two lowest quartiles of physical activity (from HR=1·12, 95% CI 1·08–1·16, for the second lowest quartile of physical activity [<16 MET-h per week] and sitting <4 h/day; to HR=1·59, 1·52–1·66, for the lowest quartile of physical activity [<2·5 MET-h per week] and sitting >8 h/day). Daily sitting time was not associated with increased all-cause mortality in those in the most active quartile of physical activity. Compared with the referent (<4 h of sitting per day and highest quartile of physical activity [>35·5 MET-h per week]), there was no increased risk of mortality during follow-up in those who sat for more than 8 h/day but who also reported >35·5 MET-h per week of activity (HR=1·04; 95% CI 0·99–1·10). By contrast, those who sat the least (<4 h/day) and were in the lowest activity quartile (<2·5 MET-h per week) had a significantly increased risk of dying during follow-up (HR=1·27, 95% CI 1·22–1·31). Six studies had data on TV-viewing time (N=465 450; 43 740 deaths). Watching TV for 3 h or more per day was associated with increased mortality regardless of physical activity, except in the most active quartile, where mortality was significantly increased only in people who watched TV for 5 h/day or more (HR=1·16, 1·05–1·28). Interpretation High levels of moderate intensity physical activity (ie, about 60–75 min per day) seem to eliminate the increased risk of death associated with high sitting time. However, this high activity level attenuates, but does not eliminate the increased risk associated with high TV-viewing time. These results provide further evidence on the benefits of physical activity, particularly in societies where increasing numbers of people have to sit for long hours for work and may also inform future public health recommendations. Funding None.
[+]

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Lancet due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2016, it was in position 2/155, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Medicine, General & Internal.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from World Citations from Scopus Elsevier, it yields a value for the Field-Weighted Citation Impact from the Scopus agency: 66.36, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: ESI Nov 13, 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2026-04-06, the following number of citations:

  • Scopus: 1858
  • Open Alex: 2175
[+]

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2026-04-06:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 2897.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 2898 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 5093.
  • The number of mentions on the social network Facebook: 131 (Altmetric).
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 1535 (Altmetric).
  • The number of mentions in news outlets: 496 (Altmetric).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.
Continuing with the social impact of the work, it is important to emphasize that, due to its content, it can be assigned to the area of interest of ODS 3 - Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages, with a probability of 89% according to the mBERT algorithm developed by Aurora University.
[+]

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

This work has been carried out with international collaboration, specifically with researchers from: Australia; Brazil; Denmark; Japan; Netherlands; Norway; United Kingdom; United States of America.

[+]