{rfName}

Indexed in

License and use

Icono OpenAccess

Citations

1

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Lloredo Alix, Luis ManuelAuthor

Share

July 8, 2024
Publications
>
Article
Sí

Derechos de la naturaleza y bienes comunes naturales: análisis de algunas tensiones conceptuales a la luz del caso chileno

Publicated to:Revista De Estudios Politicos. (204): 241-275 - 2024-01-01 (204), DOI: 10.18042/cepc/rep.204.08

Authors: Lloredo Alix, Luis Manuel

Affiliations

Abstract

The notion of commons has been reintroduced into the contemporary legal-political vocabulary, but there is much confusion about its meaning. In this article I attempt to offer some classificatory criteria that may be useful in distinguishing diverse uses of the concept. A distinction is made between "natural and social" approaches to the commons, and between "localist and globalist" conceptions. This followed by an analysis of these conceptual tensions in relation to the inclusion of the rights of nature and the natural commons in the Chilean Constitutional Convention of 2022. It concludes with a response to the local/global aporia of the commons, based on Bruno Latour's idea of the "terrestrial".

Keywords

AnthropocentrismAnticapitalismCommon goodsCommonsDemocracyRights of natureSocioecological systemsSovereigntSovereignty

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Revista De Estudios Politicos due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency Dialnet (Dialnet Métricas). In the year of publication of the work, 2024 there are still no calculated indicators, but in 2023, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil).

Notably, the journal is positioned in the Quartile Q4 for the agency WoS (JCR), in the category Political Science, in the Quartile Q3 for the agency Scopus (SJR), in the category Sociology and Political Science, classified as B in other national agencies such as CIRC, classified as A by the agency AGUAR.

Independientemente del impacto esperado determinado por el canal de difusión, es importante destacar el impacto real observado de la propia aportación.

Según las diferentes agencias de indexación, el número de citas acumuladas por esta publicación hasta la fecha 2025-08-18:

  • Dialnet Métricas: 1

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-08-18:

  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 4 (PlumX).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.
  • Assignment of a Handle/URN as an identifier within the deposit in the Institutional Repository: https://repositorio.uam.es/handle/10486/720610

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: First Author (LLOREDO ALIX, LUIS MANUEL) and Last Author (LLOREDO ALIX, LUIS MANUEL).