Indexado en

Enlace externo

Licencia y uso

Citaciones

Altmetrics

Análisis de autorías institucional

García-Rodríguez JAutor o Coautor

Compartir

Antimicrobial stewardship in hospitals: Expert recommendation guidance document for activities in specific populations, syndromes and other aspects (PROA-2) from SEIMC, SEFH, SEMPSPGS, SEMICYUC and SEIP

Publicado en:ENFERMEDADES INFECCIOSAS Y MICROBIOLOGIA CLINICA. 41 (4): 238-242 - 2023-04-03 41(4), DOI: 10.1016/j.eimc.2022.05.005

Autores: Cercenado, Emilia; Rodriguez-Bano, Jesus; Alfonso, Jose Luis; Calbo, Esther; Escosa, Luis; Fernandez-Polo, Aurora; Garcia-Rodriguez, Julio; Garnacho, Jose; Gil-Navarro, Maria Victoria; Grau, Santiago; Gudiol, Carlota; Horcajada, Juan Pablo; Larrosa, Nieves; Martinez, Carmen; Molina, Jose; Nuvials, Xavier; Oliver, Antonio; Pano-Pardo, Jose Ramon; Perez-Rodriguez, Maria Teresa; Ramirez, Paula; Rey-Biel, Pedro; Vidal, Pablo; Retamar-Gentil, Pilar

Afiliaciones

Resumen

In 2012, The Spanish Societies of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC), Hospital Pharmacy (SEFH), and Preventive Medicine, Public Health and Healthcare Management (SEMPSGS) lead a consensus document including recommendations for the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs (AMSP; PROA in Spanish) in acute care hospitals in Spain. While these recommendations were critical for the development of these programs in many centres, there is a need for guidance in the development of AMS activities for specific patient populations, syndromes or other specific aspects which were not included in the previous document or have developed significantly since then. The objective of this expert recommendation guidance document is to review the available information about these activities in these patient populations or circumstances, and to provide guidance recommendations about them. With this objective the SEIMC, SEFH, SEMPSPGS, the Spanish Society of Intensive Care Medicine (SEMICYUC) and the Spanish Pediatric Infectious Disease Society (SEIP) selected a panel of experts who chose the different aspects to include in the document. Because of the lack of high-level evidence in the implementation of the activities, the panel opted to perform a narrative review of the literature for the different topics for which recommendations were agreed by consensus. The document was open to public consultation for the members of these societies for their comments and suggestions, which were reviewed and considered by the panel.

Palabras clave