{rfName}
Sh

Indexed in

License and use

Citations

34

Altmetrics

Grant support

This work was supported in part by Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (PI13/0119, PI16/00049, CB06/06/1088) and Asociacion Cientifica Pulmon y Ventilacion Mecanica.

Analysis of institutional authors

Suarez-Sipmann, FernandoAuthor
Share
Publications
>
Editorial Material

Should the ART trial change our practice?

Publicated to:Journal of Thoracic Disease. 9 (12): 4871-4877 - 2017-12-01 9(12), DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2017.11.01

Authors: Villar, J; Suárez-Sipmann, F; Kacmarek, RM

Affiliations

Harvard Univ, Dept Anesthesia & Crit Care, Boston, MA 02115 USA - Author
Hosp Univ Dr Negrin, Res Unit, MODERN, Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain - Author
Hosp Univ La Fe, Intens Care Unit, Valencia, Spain - Author
Inst Salud Carlos III, CIBER Enfermedades Resp, Madrid, Spain - Author
Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Resp Care, Boston, MA 02114 USA - Author
St Michael Hosp, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Inst, Keenan Res Ctr Biomed Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada - Author
Uppsala Univ Hosp, Dept Surg Sci Anesthesiol & Crit Care, Hedenstierna Lab, Uppsala, Sweden - Author
See more

Abstract

Keywords
Acute lung injuryAcute respiratory-distressAdultsEnd-expiratory pressureRandomized controlled-trialRecruitment maneuversTidal volumesVentilation strategy

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Journal of Thoracic Disease due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency Scopus (SJR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2017, it was in position , thus managing to position itself as a Q2 (Segundo Cuartil), in the category Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Notably, the journal is positioned en el Cuartil Q4 for the agency WoS (JCR) in the category Respiratory System.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from the Field Citation Ratio (FCR) of the Dimensions source, it yields a value of: 5.33, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: Dimensions May 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-05-25, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 17
  • Scopus: 17
  • OpenCitations: 17
Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-05-25:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 23.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 23 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 5.7.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 6 (Altmetric).