{rfName}
Co

Indexed in

License and use

Citations

4

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Sanchez Gonzalez, Maria CarmenAuthor
Share
Publications
>
Review

Complications of Small Aperture Intracorneal Inlays: A Literature Review

Publicated to:Life. 13 (2): - 2023-02-01 13(2), DOI: 10.3390/life13020312

Authors: Sánchez-González, MC; Gutiérrez-Sánchez, E; Sánchez-González, JM; De-Hita-Cantalejo, C; Pinero-Rodríguez, AM; González-Cruces, T; Capote-Puente, R

Affiliations

Hosp Arruzafa, Dept Anterior Segment Cornea & Refract Surg, Cordoba 14012, Spain - Author
Univ Seville, Dept Phys Condensed Matter, Opt Area, Seville 41012, Spain - Author
Univ Seville, Dept Surg, Ophthalmol Area, Seville 41009, Spain - Author

Abstract

Presbyopia can be defined as the refractive state of the eye in which, due to a physiological decrease in the ability to accommodate, it is not possible to sustain vision without fatigue in a prolonged manner, along with difficulty focusing near vision. It is estimated that its prevalence in 2030 will be approximately 2.1 billion people. Corneal inlays are an alternative in the correction of presbyopia. They are implanted beneath a laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) flap or in a pocket in the center of the cornea of the non-dominant eye. The purpose of this review is to provide information about intraoperative and postoperative KAMRA inlay complications in the available scientific literature. A search was conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus with the following search strategy: ("KAMRA inlay" OR "KAMRA" OR "corneal inlay pinhole" OR "pinhole effect intracorneal" OR "SAICI" OR "small aperture intracorneal inlay") AND ("complication" OR "explantation" OR "explanted" OR "retired"). The bibliography consulted shows that the insertion of a KAMRA inlay is an effective procedure that improves near vision with a slight decrease in distance vision. However, postoperative complications such as corneal fibrosis, epithelial iron deposits, and stromal haze are described.

Keywords
corneal inlay pinholeintraoperative complicationskamra inlaypostoperative complicationspresbyopiarefractive surgerysaiciCorneal inlayCorneal inlay pinholeEyeImplantationIn-situ keratomileusisIntraoperative complicationsKamra inlayLasikOptical coherence tomographyPostoperative complicationsPresbyopiaPresbyopia correctionRefractive surgerySaiciSmall aperture intracorneal inlayStereopsisSurgical compensationVisual outcomes

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Life due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2023, it was in position 26/109, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Biology.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from the Field Citation Ratio (FCR) of the Dimensions source, it yields a value of: 1.59, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: Dimensions May 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-05-15, the following number of citations:

  • Scopus: 4
Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-05-15:

  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 10 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as: