{rfName}
Ta

Indexed in

License and use

Citations

Altmetrics

Impact on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Analysis of institutional authors

Poza Poyatos, AlbertoCorresponding Author

Share

December 20, 2022
Publications
>
Article
Hybrid Gold

Taiping Jing 太平經: Fuente para la institucionalización del taoísmo religioso

Publicated to:Ilu. Revista de Ciencias de las Religiones. 22 (22): 323-341 - 2017-01-01 22(22), DOI: 10.5209/ilur.57419

Authors: Poza Poyatos, Alberto

Affiliations

Universidad Autónoma de Madrid - Author

Abstract

La decadencia del gobierno Han en los primeros siglos de nuestra era deriva en una sociedad receptiva a los mensajes salvíficos que propicia la aparición de movimientos milenaristas. Estas organizaciones, con unos valores fundamentados en la cosmología taoísta, desarrollan un nuevo discurso en torno a la moral y la responsabilidad social, instauran una nueva fuente de autoridad personificada en los maestros y en definitiva; plantean por primera vez un modelo alternativo y crítico con la ortodoxia confuciana vigente. En este trabajo se analiza el papel del Taiping Jing «Escritos sobre la Gran Paz» como nueva fuente de autoridad textual para estos procesos y su importancia en la cohesión del movimiento taoísta y posterior institucionalización de lo que algunos autores denominan taoísmo religioso.

Keywords

Ciencias humanasCiencias socialesEstudis religiososFilologia, lingüística i sociolingüísticaFilosofíaHistoriaHistoria general y especializadaInterdisciplinaresPhilosophyReligionReligious studiesReligious studies and theologyRevistas de historia y filosofía

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Ilu. Revista de Ciencias de las Religiones due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency Scopus (SJR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2017, it was in position , thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Religious Studies.

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-07-08:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 2.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 2 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 1.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 1 (Altmetric).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.
Continuing with the social impact of the work, it is important to emphasize that, due to its content, it can be assigned to the area of interest of ODS 16 - Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels, with a probability of 62% according to the mBERT algorithm developed by Aurora University.

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: First Author (POZA POYATOS, ALBERTO) and Last Author (POZA POYATOS, ALBERTO).

the author responsible for correspondence tasks has been POZA POYATOS, ALBERTO.