{rfName}
Ge

Indexed in

License and use

Citations

8

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Ramos-Levi AAuthor

Share

Publications
>
Article

Genetic variants for prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus and modulation of susceptibility by a nutritional intervention based on a Mediterranean diet

Publicated to:Frontiers In Endocrinology. 13 1036088- - 2022-10-13 13(), DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1036088

Authors: Ramos-Levi A; Barabash A; Valerio J; García de la Torre N; Mendizabal L; Zulueta M; de Miguel MP; Diaz A; Duran A; Familiar C; Jimenez I; del Valle L; Melero V; Moraga I; Herraiz MA; Torrejon MJ; Arregi M; Simón L; Rubio MA; Calle-Pascual AL

Affiliations

Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Diabetes y Enfermedades Metabólicas Asociadas , Hospital Clínico San Carlos de Madrid - Author
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Diabetes y Enfermedades Metabólicas Asociadas , Hospital Clínico San Carlos de Madrid , Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Medicina - Author
Clinical Laboratory - Author
Ctr Invest Biomed Red Diabet & Enfermedades Metab, Madrid, Spain - Author
Hosp Clin Univ San Carlos, Clin Lab Dept, Madrid, Spain - Author
Hosp Clin Univ San Carlos, Endocrinol & Nutr Dept, Madrid, Spain - Author
Hosp Clin Univ San Carlos, Gynecol & Obstet Dept, Madrid, Spain - Author
Hospital Clinico San Carlos de Madrid - Author
Hospital Clínico San Carlos de Madrid , Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Medicina - Author
Inst Invest Sanitaria Hosp Clin San Carlos IdISSC, Madrid, Spain - Author
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital Universitario de La Princesa - Author
Patia Europe, Clin Lab, San Sebastian, Spain - Author
Univ Autonoma Madrid, Hosp Univ la Princesa, Inst Invest Princesa, Endocrinol & Nutr Dept, Madrid, Spain - Author
Univ Complutense Madrid, Fac Med, Med Dept 2, Madrid, Spain - Author
See more

Abstract

Hypothesis: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) entails a complex underlying pathogenesis, with a specific genetic background and the effect of environmental factors. This study examines the link between a set of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with diabetes and the development of GDM in pregnant women with different ethnicities, and evaluates its potential modulation with a clinical intervention based on a Mediterranean diet. Methods: 2418 women from our hospital-based cohort of pregnant women screened for GDM from January 2015 to November 2017 (the San Carlos Cohort, randomized controlled trial for the prevention of GDM ISRCTN84389045 and real-world study ISRCTN13389832) were assessed for evaluation. Diagnosis of GDM was made according to the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria. Genotyping was performed by IPLEX MassARRAY PCR using the Agena platform (Agena Bioscience, SanDiego, CA). 110 SNPs were selected for analysis based on selected literature references. Statistical analyses regarding patients’ characteristics were performed in SPSS (Chicago, IL, USA) version 24.0. Genetic association tests were performed using PLINK v.1.9 and 2.0 software. Bioinformatics analysis, with mapping of SNPs was performed using STRING, version 11.5. Results: Quality controls retrieved a total 98 SNPs and 1573 samples, 272 (17.3%) with GDM and 1301 (82.7%) without GDM. 1104 (70.2%) were Caucasian (CAU) and 469 (29.8%) Hispanic (HIS). 415 (26.4%) were from the control group (CG), 418 (26.6%) from the nutritional intervention group (IG) and 740 (47.0%) from the real-world group (RW). 40 SNPs (40.8%) presented some kind of significant association with GDM in at least one of the genetic tests considered. The nutritional intervention presented a significant association with GDM, regardless of the variant considered. In CAU, variants rs4402960, rs7651090, IGF2BP2; rs1387153, rs10830963, MTNR1B; rs17676067, GLP2R; rs1371614, DPYSL5; rs5215, KCNJ1; and rs2293941, PDX1 were significantly associated with an increased risk of GDM, whilst rs780094, GCKR; rs7607980, COBLL1; rs3746750, SLC17A9; rs6048205, FOXA2; rs7041847, rs7034200, rs10814916, GLIS3; rs3783347, WARS; and rs1805087, MTR, were significantly associated with a decreased risk of GDM, In HIS, variants significantly associated with increased risk of GDM were rs9368222, CDKAL1; rs2302593, GIPR; rs10885122, ADRA2A; rs1387153, MTNR1B; rs737288, BACE2; rs1371614, DPYSL5; and rs2293941, PDX1, whilst rs340874, PROX1; rs2943634, IRS1; rs7041847, GLIS3; rs780094, GCKR; rs563694, G6PC2; and rs11605924, CRY2 were significantly associated with decreased risk for GDM. Conclusions: We identify a core set of SNPs in their association with diabetes and GDM in a large cohort of patients from two main ethnicities from a single center. Identification of these genetic variants, even in the setting of a nutritional intervention, deems useful to design preventive and therapeutic strategies.

Keywords

architecturebace2genetic polymorphismsgenetic risk variantsgestational diabetes mellitushkdc1influencing glycemic traitsinsightmediterranean dietnutritional interventionpolymorphismspregnancyrisksingle nucleotide polymorphismssnpsGenetic polymorphismsGenetic risk variantsGenome-wide associationGestational diabetes mellitusMediterranean dietNutritional interventionSingle nucleotide polymorphismsSnps

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Frontiers In Endocrinology due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2022, it was in position 36/145, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Endocrinology & Metabolism.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from World Citations from Scopus Elsevier, it yields a value for the Field-Weighted Citation Impact from the Scopus agency: 1.67, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: ESI Nov 14, 2024)

This information is reinforced by other indicators of the same type, which, although dynamic over time and dependent on the set of average global citations at the time of their calculation, consistently position the work at some point among the top 50% most cited in its field:

  • Field Citation Ratio (FCR) from Dimensions: 5.13 (source consulted: Dimensions Jun 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-06-27, the following number of citations:

  • Scopus: 8

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-06-27:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 66.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 66 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 0.5.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 2 (Altmetric).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: First Author (RAMOS LEVI, ANA MARIA) .