{rfName}
So

Indexed in

License and use

Citations

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Ernesto Castro CórdobaAuthor

Share

Publications
>
Book Review

Sobre el nombre del giro realista de la filosofía en el siglo XXI. (Auto)reseña de Castro, E. (2020). Realismo poscontinental: Ontología y epistemología para el siglo XXI. Segovia: Materia Oscura. ISBN: 978-84-949805-3-4

Publicated to:Revista Stultifera de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales. 3 (2): 219-227 - 2020-01-01 3(2), DOI: 10.4206/rev.stultifera.2020.v3n2-10

Authors: Castro Córdoba, Ernesto

Affiliations

Abstract

En la tesis doctoral que originó mi libro Realismo poscontinental (la primera escrita en castellano sobre el giro realista de la filosofía en el siglo XXI), acuñé la expresión realismo poscontinental para bautizar dicho giro filosófico, en vez de recurrir a las etiquetas más frecuentes de nuevo realismo o de realismo especulativo. En esta reseña aclaratoria expongo las razones que me llevaron a preferir esa fórmula sobre sus alternativas. En resumidas cuentas, “realismo poscontinental” expresa mejor la genealogía intelectual de filósofos tan distintos como Markus Gabriel y Maurizio Ferraris (los sedicientes “nuevos realistas”) o como Quentin Meillassoux, Ray Brassier, Graham Harman e Iain Hamilton Grant (fundadores involuntarios del “realismo especulativo” en 2007). Para ser más exactos, mi neologismo captura mejor la unidad y novedad de esos seis autores. “Nuevo realismo” alude a su novedad, pero no la define. Además, en la historia de la filosofía ya tenemos un grupo de autores que se calificaron a sí mismos de neorrealistas o novorrealistas: los abajofirmantes del manifiesto que encabezó Edwin Bissell Holt en 1910 contra el dualismo epistemológico basado en la distinción sujeto-objeto (Bolt et al., 1912).

Keywords

Ciencias humanasCiencias socialesCultural studiesGender studiesInterdisciplinary research in the humanitiesInterdisciplinary research in the social sciencesPhilosophy

Quality index

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-06-01:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 3.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 3 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 2.2.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 3 (Altmetric).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.
  • Additionally, the work has been submitted to a journal classified as Diamond in relation to this type of editorial policy.

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: First Author (CASTRO CORDOBA, ERNESTO) .