{rfName}
Em

License and Use

Icono OpenAccess

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

álvaro Briales CansecoAuthor

Share

October 12, 2022
Publications
>
Article

Emprendeudores fracasados: individualización neoliberal en los discursos sobre el desempleo

Publicated to: Recerca. Revista de Pensament i Anàlisi. (20): 79-104 - 2017-01-01 (20), DOI: 10.6035/Recerca.2017.20.5

Authors:

Briales Canseco, Álvaro
[+]

Affiliations

Universidad Complutense de Madrid - Author

Abstract

En este artículo sostenemos que el discurso del emprendimiento opera como un dispositivo de individualización de la relación salarial que oculta el fuerte contraste entre el plano ideal –autonomía, independencia subjetiva, éxito- y los obstáculos materiales reales –profundización del endeudamiento, alta proporción de fracaso, precarización-.
[+]

Keywords

DebtDiscourseEntrepreneursNeoliberalismUnemployment

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Recerca. Revista de Pensament i Anàlisi due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency Dialnet (Dialnet Métricas). In the year of publication of the work, 2017, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil).

Notably, the journal is positioned in the Quartile Q3 for the agency Scopus (SJR), in the category Philosophy, classified as A in other national agencies such as CIRC, classified as C by the agency AGUAR.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from World Citations from Scopus Elsevier, it yields a value for the Field-Weighted Citation Impact from the Scopus agency: 2, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: ESI Nov 13, 2025)

This information is reinforced by other indicators of the same type, which, although dynamic over time and dependent on the set of average global citations at the time of their calculation, consistently position the work at some point among the top 50% most cited in its field:

  • Normalized Impact calculated by Dialnet Metrics: 112.5 (source consulted: Dialnet Metrics Dec 2023)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2026-04-05, the following number of citations:

  • Scopus: 12
[+]

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2026-04-05:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 24.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 26 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 1.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 1 (Altmetric).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.
  • Additionally, the work has been submitted to a journal classified as Diamond in relation to this type of editorial policy.
[+]

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: First Author (BRIALES CANSECO, ALVARO) and Last Author (BRIALES CANSECO, ALVARO).

[+]