{rfName}
Di

Indexed in

License and use

Icono OpenAccess

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

De La Vega, RicardoAuthorRuiz-Barquin, RobertoAuthor

Share

April 3, 2025
Publications
>
Article

Dimensions of passion and their relationship to the risk of exercise addiction: Cultural and gender differences

Publicated to:Addictive Behaviors Reports. 16 100451- - 2022-12-01 16(), DOI: 10.1016/j.abrep.2022.100451

Authors: Szabo, Attila; de la Vega, Ricardo; Kovacsik, Rita; Almendros, Lucia Jimenez; Ruiz-Barquin, Roberto; Demetrovics, Zsolt; Boros, Szilvia; Koteles, Ferenc

Affiliations

Autonomous Univ Madrid, Dept Dev & Educ Psychol, Madrid, Spain - Author
Autonomous Univ Madrid, Dept Phys Educ Sport & Human Movement, Madrid, Spain - Author
Eotvos Lorand Univ, Inst Hlth Promot & Sport Sci, Budapest, Hungary - Author
Eotvos Lorand Univ, Inst Psychol, Budapest, Hungary - Author
Univ Gibraltar, Ctr Excellence Responsible Gaming, Gibraltar, Gibraltar - Author
See more

Abstract

This study was performed to investigate further the two-dimensional aspect of passion and its relationship to the risk of exercise addiction (REA) in nine nations and to clarify the unresolved gender differences. The here reported results stem from the reanalysis of data gathered in three previous empirical studies. The analyses demonstrated that harmonious (HP) and obsessive (OP) passion are two independent, non-interacting predictors of the REA, the prevalence of which was 12.1 % in the current sample that included 1448 people (age = 30.49 +/- SD = 11.17 years; 55 % men), who exercised at least three hours per week. Furthermore, the results show that HP and OP could co-exist as a single 'total' or 'true' passion within the individual or in high-low HP and OP proportions, supporting the proposal for one, two-dimensional passion. Indeed, most people at REA demonstrated both high HP and high OP. The weekly amount of exercise was weakly associated with the two dimensions of passion. Relatively specific cultural differences in the REA and OP, but not HP, have emerged. The results also demonstrate that when a minimal weekly volume of training (i.e., 3 h) is a criterion for participant recruitment, no gender differences occur in the REA.

Keywords

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from the Field Citation Ratio (FCR) of the Dimensions source, it yields a value of: 6.47, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: Dimensions Jul 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-07-04, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 8
  • Scopus: 11
  • Europe PMC: 2

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-07-04:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 27.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 28 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 12.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 4 (Altmetric).
  • The number of mentions in news outlets: 1 (Altmetric).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.
  • Assignment of a Handle/URN as an identifier within the deposit in the Institutional Repository: https://repositorio.uam.es/handle/10486/706815

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

This work has been carried out with international collaboration, specifically with researchers from: Gibraltar; Hungary.