{rfName}
Br

License and use

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Stavraki, MCorresponding AuthorParedes, BAuthorDiaz, DAuthor

Share

Publications
>
Article

Brief Version of the Ryff Psychological Well-Being Scales for Children and Adolescents: Evidence of Validity

Publicated to:PSICOTHEMA. 34 (2): 316-322 - 2022-01-01 34(2), DOI: 10.7334/psicothema2021.235

Authors: Stavraki, Maria; Garcia-Marquez, Ricardo; Bajo, Miriam; Callejas-Albinana, Ana, I; Paredes, Borja; Diaz, Dario

Affiliations

Univ Autonoma Madrid, Madrid, Spain - Author
Univ Castilla La Mancha, Ciudad Real 13071, Spain - Author

Abstract

Antecedentes: el bienestar se ha convertido en un concepto central para el estudio de la salud infantil, aunque los instrumentos previos para su evaluación se han centrado en su componente hedónico. Por ello, nuestro objetivo fue adaptar las Escalas de Bienestar Psicológico para su uso con niños y adolescentes utilizando un enfoque de un único ítem por dimensión. Método: un total de 312 participantes (52,9% mujeres; edades 10-18) españoles completaron la nueva versión reducida de las escalas de bienestar psicológico, el índice de bienestar de la OMS-5, y su bienestar fue evaluado mediante una entrevista semiestructurada. Resultados: el análisis paralelo y el análisis factorial exploratorio sugirieron una estructura unidimensional que mostró un ajuste excelente a los datos. Además, la nueva medida presentó invariancia escalar para el género y la edad. La nueva escala correlacionó significativamente con la escala de OMS-5, así como con la evaluación del experto externo sobre la satisfacción con la vida global, indicando una adecuada validez de criterio. Conclusiones: la versión reducida de las Escalas de Bienestar Psicológico para jóvenes ha mostrado unas excelentes propiedades psicométricas, siendo un instrumento de medición breve que reduce la fatiga cognitiva de los jóvenes durante la evaluación.

Keywords

AdaptationAdolescentChildChildrenEudaimonicExploratory factor-analysisFactor analysisFactor analysis, statisticalFemaleHappinessHumanHumansLife satisfactionMaleMeasurementMental-healthMultiple-itemPsychometric propertiesQuality of lifeReliabilityReproducibilityReproducibility of resultsSingle-item measuresSpainValidationWell-being

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal PSICOTHEMA due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency Scopus (SJR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2022, it was in position , thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Psychology (Miscellaneous).

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from World Citations provided by WoS (ESI, Clarivate), it yields a value for the citation normalization relative to the expected citation rate of: 1.4. This indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: ESI Nov 14, 2024)

This information is reinforced by other indicators of the same type, which, although dynamic over time and dependent on the set of average global citations at the time of their calculation, consistently position the work at some point among the top 50% most cited in its field:

  • Weighted Average of Normalized Impact by the Scopus agency: 2.26 (source consulted: FECYT Feb 2024)
  • Field Citation Ratio (FCR) from Dimensions: 4.65 (source consulted: Dimensions Jun 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-06-22, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 3
  • Scopus: 7
  • Google Scholar: 19

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-06-22:

  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 129 (PlumX).

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: First Author (STAVRAKI ., MARIA) and Last Author (DIAZ MENDEZ, DARIO).

the author responsible for correspondence tasks has been STAVRAKI ., MARIA.