Indexed in

External link

License and use

Citations

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Chaparro MAuthorGisbert JpAuthor

Share

Endoscopic Postoperative Recurrence In Crohn's Disease After Curative Ileocecal Resection With Early Prophylaxis By Anti-Tnf, Vedolizumab Or Ustekinumab: A Real-World Multicenter European Study

Publicated to:Journal of Crohns & Colitis. 16 (12): jjac100-jjac100 - 2022-12-05 16(12), DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac100

Authors: Yanai H, Kagramanova A, Knyazev O, Sabino J, Haenen S, Mantzaris GJ, Mountaki K, Armuzzi A, Pugliese D, Furfaro F, Fiorino G, Drobne D, Kurent T, Yassin S, Maharshak N, Castiglione F, de Sire R, Nardone OM, Farkas K, Molnar T, Krznaric Z, Brinar M, Chashkova E, Livne Margolin M, Kopylov U, Bezzio C, Bar-Gil Shitrit A, Lukas M, Chaparro M, Truyens M, Nancey S, Lobaton T, Gisbert JP, Saibeni S, Bacsúr P, Bossuyt P, Schulberg J, Hoentjen F, Viganò C, Palermo A, Torres J, Revés J, Karmiris K, Velegraki M, Savarino E, Markopoulos P, Tsironi E, Ellul P, Calviño Suárez C, Weisshof R, Ben-Hur D, Naftali T, Eriksson C, Koutroubakis IE, Foteinogiannopoulou K, Limdi JK, Liu E, Surís G, Calabrese E, Zorzi F, Filip R, Ribaldone DG, Snir Y, Goren I, Banai-Eran H, Broytman Y, Amir Barak H, Avni-Biron I, Ollech JE, Dotan I, Aharoni Golan M

Affiliations

Abstract

Endoscopic-post-operative-recurrence (ePOR) in Crohn's disease (CD) after ileocecal resection (ICR) is a major concern. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of early prophylaxis with biologics and to compare anti-TNF therapy to vedolizumab (VDZ) and ustekinumab (UST) in a real-world setting.A retrospective multicenter study of CD-adults after curative ICR on early prophylaxis. ePOR was defined as a Rutgeerts score [RS]?i2 or colonic-segmental-SES-CD?6. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate risk factors, and inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied to compare the effectiveness between agents.Included 297 patients (53.9% males, age at diagnosis 24y[19-32], age at ICR-34y[26-43], 18.5% smokers, 27.6% biologic-naïve, 65.7% anti-TNF experienced, 28.6%?2 biologics, and 17.2% previous surgery). Overall, 224, 39 and 34 patients received anti-TNF, VDZ or UST, respectively. Patients treated with VDZ and UST were more biologic experienced with higher rates of previous surgery. ePOR rates within 1-year were: 41.8%. ePOR rates by treatment groups: anti-TNF 40.2%, VDZ 33% and UST 61.8%. Risk factors for ePOR at 1-year: past-infliximab (adj.OR=1.73[95%CI:1.01-2.97]), past-adalimumab (adj.OR=2.32[95% CI:1.35-4.01) and surgical aspects. After IPTW, the risk of ePOR within 1-year of VDZ vs. anti-TNF or UST vs. anti-TNF was comparable (OR=0.55[95%CI:0.25-1.19], OR=1.86[95%CI:0.79-4.38]), respectively.Prevention of ePOR within 1-year after surgery was successful in ~60% of patients. Patients treated with VDZ or UST consisted of a more refractory group. After controlling for confounders, no differences in ePOR risk were seen between anti-TNF prophylaxis and other groups.© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Keywords