{rfName}
Ut

Indexed in

License and use

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Vicente-Rabaneda EfAuthorCastañeda SCorresponding Author

Share

Publications
>
Review

Utility of tocilizumab in autoimmune eye diseases

Publicated to:EXPERT OPINION ON BIOLOGICAL THERAPY. 22 (6): 789-799 - 2022-04-22 22(6), DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2022.2066971

Authors: Atienza-Mateo, B; Prieto-Peña, D; Blanco, R; González-Gay, MA; Vicente-Rabaneda, EF; Castañeda, S

Affiliations

Cardiovascular Pathophysiology and Genomics Research Unit, School of Physiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. - Author
Department of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Cátedra UAM-Roche, EPID-Future, Madrid, Spain. - Author
Department of Medicine, University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain. - Author
Hosp Princesa, Rheumatol Div, IIS Princesa, Calle Diego Leon 62, Madrid 28006, Spain - Author
Hosp Univ Marques Valdecilla, Rheumatol Div, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain - Author
Rheumatology Division, Hospital de La Princesa, IIS-Princesa, Madrid, Spain. - Author
Rheumatology Division, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain. - Author
Univ Autonoma Madrid, Dept Med, Catedra UAM ROCHE, EPID Future, Madrid, Spain - Author
Univ Cantabria, Dept Med, Santander, Spain - Author
Univ Witwatersrand, Sch Physiol, Cardiovasc Pathophysiol & Genom Res Unit, Fac Hlth Sci, Johannesburg, South Africa - Author
See more

Abstract

Autoimmune eye diseases (AED) are inflammatory eye conditions caused by dysregulation of the immune system at the ocular level. Among them, the most representative is noninfectious uveitis, which can be limited to the eye or associated with various systemic autoimmune diseases. Other conditions include peripheral ulcerative keratitis, Graves' orbitopathy, and some forms of optic neuropathy. Glucocorticoids are the cornerstone of treatment for most AEDs. However, conventional and/or biologic immunosuppressive drugs are often required to achieve clinical remission and reduce adverse events related to long-term glucocorticoid therapy.To summarize all the available evidence on the use of the anti-interleukin-6 tocilizumab receptor (TCZ) for the different AEDs.The heterogeneity of the reported studies and the relatively small number of prospective randomized clinical trials make it difficult to establish robust guidelines on the positioning of TCZ in the treatment of AEDs. However, based on our own experience and the growing number of published studies, we are in favor of the use of TCZ as an effective and safe alternative for patients with severe and/or refractory AEDs. We highlight the efficacy of TCZ in patients with optic neuropathy related to giant cell arteritis, noninfectious uveitis, and Graves´ orbitopathy.

Keywords

anti-il6-receptor antibodiesbiologic therapycystoid macular edemagraves orbitopathygraves' orbitopathyintravenous tocilizumabjuvenile idiopathic arthritisneuromyelitis optica spectrum disordersnoninfectious uveitisoptic neuropathyperipheral ulcerative keratitisreceptor tocilizumabrheumatoid-arthritissubcutaneous tocilizumabtocilizumabvisual involvementAnti-il6-receptor antibodiesAntibodies, monoclonal, humanizedAutoimmune diseaseAutoimmune eye diseasesClinical trialComplicationDrug useEndocrine ophthalmopathyEye diseaseGiant-cell arteritisGraves ophthalmopathyGraves’ orbitopathyHumanHumansMonoclonal antibodyMulticenter study (topic)Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disordersNoninfectious uveitisOptic nerve diseaseOptic nerve diseasesOptic neuropathyPeripheral ulcerative keratitisPhase 1 clinical trial (topic)Phase 2 clinical trial (topic)Prospective studiesProspective studyRandomized controlled trial (topic)Retina macula cystoid edemaReviewTocilizumabUveitisVasculitis

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal EXPERT OPINION ON BIOLOGICAL THERAPY due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency Scopus (SJR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2022, it was in position , thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Pharmacology.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from World Citations from Scopus Elsevier, it yields a value for the Field-Weighted Citation Impact from the Scopus agency: 1.52, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: ESI Nov 14, 2024)

This information is reinforced by other indicators of the same type, which, although dynamic over time and dependent on the set of average global citations at the time of their calculation, consistently position the work at some point among the top 50% most cited in its field:

  • Field Citation Ratio (FCR) from Dimensions: 3.32 (source consulted: Dimensions Jun 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-06-27, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 4
  • Scopus: 7

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-06-27:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 19.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 19 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 4.65.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 6 (Altmetric).

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

This work has been carried out with international collaboration, specifically with researchers from: South African Republic.

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: Last Author (CASTAÑEDA SANZ, SANTOS).

the author responsible for correspondence tasks has been CASTAÑEDA SANZ, SANTOS.