{rfName}
Th

Indexed in

License and use

Icono OpenAccess

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Arribas J.r.Author

Share

Publications
>
Article

Three-year durable efficacy of dolutegravir plus lamivudine in antiretroviral therapy - naive adults with hiv-1 infection

Publicated to:AIDS. 36 (1): 39-48 - 2022-01-01 36(1), DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000003070

Authors: Cahn P; Sierra Madero J; Arribas JR; Antinori A; Ortiz R; Clarke AE; Hung CC; Rockstroh JK; Girard PM; Sievers J; Man CY; Urbaityte R; Brandon DJ; Underwood M; Pappa KA; Curtis L; Smith KY; Gartland M; Aboud M; Van Wyk J; Wynne B

Affiliations

Bliss Healthcare Serv, Orlando, FL USA - Author
Bliss Healthcare Services - Author
Fdn Huesped, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina - Author
Fundación Huésped - Author
GlaxoSmithKline plc. - Author
GlaxoSmithKline, Stockley Pk, England - Author
Hop St Antoine, Paris, France - Author
Hopital Saint-Antoine - Author
Hosp Univ La Paz, Madrid, Spain - Author
Hospital Universitario La Paz - Author
Inst Nacl Ciencias Med & Nutr Salvador Zubiran, Mexico City, DF, Mexico - Author
Instituto Nacional de la Nutricion Salvador Zubiran - Author
IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Malattie Infettive Lazzaro Spallanzani - Author
Ist Nazl Malattie Infett Lazzaro Spallanzani IRCC, Rome, Italy - Author
National Institutes of Health (NIH) - Author
National Taiwan University Hospital - Author
Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Taipei, Taiwan - Author
Royal Sussex County Hospital - Author
Royal Sussex Cty Hosp, Brighton & Sussex Med Sch, Brighton, E Sussex, England - Author
Univ Klinikum Bonn, Dept Med, Bonn, Germany - Author
Universitätsklinikum Bonn - Author
ViiV Healthcare - Author
ViiV Healthcare, 5 Moore Dr,POB 13398, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA - Author
ViiV Healthcare, Brentford, England - Author
See more

Abstract

Objective:To assess efficacy and safety of dolutegravir (DTG) + lamivudine (3TC) vs. DTG + tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) in treatment-naive adults with HIV-1 in the prespecified 144-week secondary analyses of GEMINI-1 and GEMINI-2.Design:Identical, multicenter, phase III, randomized, non-inferiority studies (double-blind through 96 weeks).Methods:Participants with HIV-1 RNA ≤500 000 copies/ml and no major viral resistance mutations to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, or protease inhibitors were randomized 1:1 to once-daily DTG + 3TC or DTG + TDF/FTC.Results:At week 144, DTG + 3TC (N = 716) was noninferior to DTG + TDF/FTC (N = 717) in proportion of participants achieving HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/ml (Snapshot algorithm) in the pooled analysis (82% vs. 84%, respectively; adjusted treatment difference [95% confidence interval (CI)], -1.8% [-5.8, 2.1]), GEMINI-1 (-3.6% [-9.4, 2.1]), and GEMINI-2 (0.0% [-5.3, 5.3]). Twelve DTG + 3TC participants and nine DTG + TDF/FTC participants met protocol-defined confirmed virologic withdrawal (CVW) criteria; none developed treatment-emergent resistance. One DTG + 3TC participant who did not meet CVW criteria developed M184V at week 132 and R263R/K at week 144, conferring a 1.8-fold change in susceptibility to DTG; non-adherence to therapy was reported. Significantly fewer drug-related adverse events occurred with DTG + 3TC vs. DTG + TDF/FTC (20% vs. 27%; relative risk [95% CI], 0.76 [0.63-0.92]). Renal and bone biomarker changes favored DTG + 3TC.Conclusions:Three-year durable efficacy, long-term tolerability, and high barrier to resistance support first-line use of DTG + 3TC for HIV-1 treatment (see Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/QAD/C297; video abstract).

Keywords

DolutegravirIntegrase strand transfer inhibitorNucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitorTreatment-naiveTwo-drug regimen

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal AIDS due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency Scopus (SJR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2022, it was in position , thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Infectious Diseases.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from World Citations provided by WoS (ESI, Clarivate), it yields a value for the citation normalization relative to the expected citation rate of: 9.28. This indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: ESI Nov 14, 2024)

This information is reinforced by other indicators of the same type, which, although dynamic over time and dependent on the set of average global citations at the time of their calculation, consistently position the work at some point among the top 50% most cited in its field:

  • Weighted Average of Normalized Impact by the Scopus agency: 13.18 (source consulted: FECYT Feb 2024)
  • Field Citation Ratio (FCR) from Dimensions: 26.84 (source consulted: Dimensions Jun 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-06-30, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 41
  • Scopus: 87
  • Europe PMC: 24

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-06-30:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 182.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 182 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 4.
  • The number of mentions in news outlets: 1 (Altmetric).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.
  • Assignment of a Handle/URN as an identifier within the deposit in the Institutional Repository: https://repositorio.uam.es/handle/10486/706438

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

This work has been carried out with international collaboration, specifically with researchers from: Argentina; France; Germany; Iran; Italy; Mexico; Taiwan; United Kingdom; United States of America.