{rfName}
An

Indexed in

License and use

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Forteza AAuthor

Share

Publications
>
Article

Anaesthetic-surgical guide in the treatment of ascending aorta and surgery of the ascending aorta and aortic arch. Consensus document of the Spanish Society of Cardiovascular and Endovascular Surgery and the Sociedad of Anaesthesiology, Resuscitation and Pain Therapy

Publicated to:Revista Espanola de Anestesiologia y Reanimacion. 69 (3): 143-178 - 2022-03-01 69(3), DOI: 10.1016/j.redar.2021.02.007

Authors: López Gómez A; Rodríguez R; Zebdi N; Ríos Barrera R; Forteza A; Legarra Calderón JJ; Garrido Martín P; Hernando B; Sanjuan A; González Bardanca S; Varela Martínez MÁ; Fernández FE; Llorens R; Valera Martínez FJ; Gómez Felices A; Aranda Granados PJ; Sádaba Sagredo R; Echevarría JR; Vicente Guillén R; Silva Guisasola J

Affiliations

Abstract

Aortic pathology is always a challenge for the clinician, and must be diagnosed and treated by a multidisciplinary team due to the technical and technological complexity of the resources used. Ongoing efforts to implement a systematic, protocolized approach involving “Aortic teams” made up of cardiologists, cardiac surgeons, vascular surgeons, anaesthesiologists and radiologists, among others are now leading to improved outcomes. The aim of this consensus document drawn up by the Aortic working groups of the Spanish Society of Anaesthesiology, Resuscitation and Pain Therapy (SEDAR) and the Spanish Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (SECTCV) is to disseminate a set of working protocols. The latest consensus document of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) and the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) define the concept of “AORTIC TEAM”(1). The aortic team should be closely involved from diagnosis to treatment and finally follow-up, and should be formed of cardiac and vascular surgeons working together with anaesthesiologists, cardiologists, radiologists and geneticists. Treatment of aortic pathologies should be centralised in large centres, because this is the only way to effectively understand the natural course of the disease, provide the entire range of treatment options under one umbrella and treat potential complications. A streamlined emergent care pathway (24/7 availability), adequate transportation and transfer capabilities, as well as rapid activation of the multidisciplinary team must be available. In light of the complexity and constant evolution of therapeutic options, we present this first version of the Anaesthesiology and surgical guidelines for surgery of the ascending aorta and aortic arch. Some questions will no doubt remain unanswered, and future versions will include new techniques that, though implemented in some centres, are still not widely recommended.

Keywords

anesthesic and surgical treatmentaneurisma de arco y aorta ascendenteaortic acute syndromeascending and aortic arch aneurysmguía practicamanejo anestésico-quirúrgicopractice guidelineAnesthesic and surgical treatmentAneurisma de arco y aorta ascendenteAortic acute syndromeAscending and aortic arch aneurysmGuía practicaManejo anestésico-quirúrgicoPractice guidelineSíndrome aortico agudo

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Revista Espanola de Anestesiologia y Reanimacion, Q3 Agency Scopus (SJR), its regional focus and specialization in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, give it significant recognition in a specific niche of scientific knowledge at an international level.

Independientemente del impacto esperado determinado por el canal de difusión, es importante destacar el impacto real observado de la propia aportación.

Según las diferentes agencias de indexación, el número de citas acumuladas por esta publicación hasta la fecha 2025-06-21:

  • WoS: 1
  • Scopus: 3
  • OpenCitations: 1

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-06-21:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 69.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 105 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 7.5.
  • The number of mentions on the social network Facebook: 1 (Altmetric).
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 11 (Altmetric).