{rfName}
Cu

Indexed in

License and use

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Llamas-Velasco, MAuthorRodriguez-Jimenez, PAuthor

Share

January 25, 2022
Publications
>
Article
No

Cutaneous reactions after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination: a cross-sectional Spanish nationwide study of 405 cases

Publicated to:BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY. 186 (1): 142-152 - 2022-01-01 186(1), DOI: 10.1111/bjd.20639

Authors: Catala, A.; Munoz-Santos, C.; Galvan-Casas, C.; Roncero Riesco, M.; Revilla Nebreda, D.; Sola-Truyols, A.; Giavedoni, P.; Llamas-Velasco, M.; Gonzalez-Cruz, C.; Cubiro, X.; Ruiz-Villaverde, R.; Gomez-Armayones, S.; Gil Mateo, M. P.; Pesque, D.; Marcantonio, O.; Fernandez-Nieto, D.; Romani, J.; Iglesias Pena, N.; Carnero Gonzalez, L.; Tercedor-Sanchez, J.; Carretero, G.; Masat-Tico, T.; Rodriguez-Jimenez, P.; Gimenez-Arnau, A. M.; Utrera-Busquets, M.; Vargas Laguna, E.; Angulo Menendez, A. G.; San Juan Lasser, E.; Iglesias-Sancho, M.; Alonso Naranjo, L.; Hiltun, I; Cutillas Marco, E.; Polimon Olabarrieta, I; Marinero Escobedo, S.; Garcia-Navarro, X.; Calderon Gutierrez, M. J.; Baeza-Hernandez, G.; Bou Camps, L.; Toledo-Pastrana, T.; Guilabert, A.;

Affiliations

Complejo Asistencial Univ Salamanca, Serv Dermatol, Salamanca, Spain - Author
Complejo Hosp Navarra, Serv Dermatol, Navarra, Spain - Author
Consorci Sanitari Alt Penedes Garraf, Serv Dermatol, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Hosp Clin Barcelona, Serv Dermatol, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Hosp Comarcal Infanta Elena, Serv Dermatol, Huelva, Spain - Author
Hosp Gen Granollers, Serv Dermatol, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Hosp Gen La Palma, Serv Dermatol, Santa Cruz De Tenerife, Spain - Author
Hosp Gen Univ Reina Sofia, Serv Dermatol, Murcia, Spain - Author
Hosp Quironsalud Infanta Luisa, Seville, Spain - Author
Hosp Raman & Cajal, Serv Dermatol, Madrid, Spain - Author
Hosp Santa Creu & Sant Pau, Serv Dermatol, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Hosp Univ Araba, Serv Dermatol, Vitoria, Spain - Author
Hosp Univ Fuenlabrada, Serv Dermatol, Madrid, Spain - Author
Hosp Univ Gran Canaria Doctor Negrin, Serv Dermatol, Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Spain - Author
Hosp Univ La Princesa, Serv Dermatol, Madrid, Spain - Author
Hosp Univ Lucus Augusti, Serv Dermatol, Lugo, Spain - Author
Hosp Univ Mostoles, Serv Dermatol, Madrid, Spain - Author
Hosp Univ Sagrat Cor, Serv Dermatol, Madrid, Spain - Author
Hosp Univ San Cecilio, Serv Dermatol, Granada, Spain - Author
Hosp Univ Severo Ochoa, Serv Dermatol, Madrid, Spain - Author
Hosp Univ Son Llatzer, Serv Dermatol, Mallorca, Spain - Author
Hosp Univ Toledo, Serv Dermatol, Toledo, Spain - Author
Hosp Univ Vall DHebron, Serv Dermatol, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Hosp Virgen de las Nieves, Serv Dermatol, Granada, Spain - Author
Inst Catala Salut, CAP Cardedeu, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Parc Tauli Hosp Univ, Serv Dermatol, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Serv Med Penedes Vilanova & Geltru, Serv Dermatol, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Univ Autonoma Barcelona, IMIM, Hosp Mar, Serv Dermatol, Barcelona, Spain - Author
See more

Abstract

Background Cutaneous reactions after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines are poorly characterized. Objective To describe and classify cutaneous reactions after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Methods A nationwide Spanish cross-sectional study was conducted. We included patients with cutaneous reactions within 21 days of any dose of the approved vaccines at the time of the study. After a face-to-face visit with a dermatologist, information on cutaneous reactions was collected via an online professional survey and clinical photographs were sent by email. Investigators searched for consensus on clinical patterns and classification. Results From 16 February to 15 May 2021, we collected 405 reactions after vaccination with the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech; 40 center dot 2%), mRNA-1273 (Moderna; 36 center dot 3%) and AZD1222 (AstraZeneca; 23 center dot 5%) vaccines. Mean patient age was 50 center dot 7 years and 80 center dot 2% were female. Cutaneous reactions were classified as injection site ('COVID arm', 32 center dot 1%), urticaria (14 center dot 6%), morbilliform (8 center dot 9%), papulovesicular (6 center dot 4%), pityriasis rosea-like (4 center dot 9%) and purpuric (4%) reactions. Varicella zoster and herpes simplex virus reactivations accounted for 13 center dot 8% of reactions. The COVID arm was almost exclusive to women (95 center dot 4%). The most reported reactions in each vaccine group were COVID arm (mRNA-1273, Moderna, 61 center dot 9%), varicella zoster virus reactivation (BNT162b2, Pfizer-BioNTech, 17 center dot 2%) and urticaria (AZD1222, AstraZeneca, 21 center dot 1%). Most reactions to the mRNA-1273 (Moderna) vaccine were described in women (90 center dot 5%). Eighty reactions (21%) were classified as severe/very severe and 81% required treatment. Conclusions Cutaneous reactions after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination are heterogeneous. Most are mild-to-moderate and self-limiting, although severe/very severe reactions are reported. Knowledge of these reactions during mass vaccination may help healthcare professionals and reassure patients.

Keywords

Covid-19 vaccination

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2022, it was in position 3/70, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Dermatology. Notably, the journal is positioned above the 90th percentile.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from World Citations provided by WoS (ESI, Clarivate), it yields a value for the citation normalization relative to the expected citation rate of: 57.61. This indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: ESI Nov 14, 2024)

This information is reinforced by other indicators of the same type, which, although dynamic over time and dependent on the set of average global citations at the time of their calculation, consistently position the work at some point among the top 50% most cited in its field:

  • Weighted Average of Normalized Impact by the Scopus agency: 52.67 (source consulted: FECYT Feb 2024)
  • Field Citation Ratio (FCR) from Dimensions: 104.53 (source consulted: Dimensions Jul 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-07-03, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 140
  • Scopus: 158

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-07-03:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 170.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 170 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 1229.
  • The number of mentions on the social network Facebook: 2 (Altmetric).
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 1582 (Altmetric).
  • The number of mentions in news outlets: 30 (Altmetric).