{rfName}
El

Indexed in

License and use

Citations

14

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Martin, AmCorresponding Author

Share

Publications
>
Article

El santuario fenicio de la calle Méndez Núñez-plaza de las Monjas (Huelva, España) y el inicio de los asentamientos fenicios en la península Ibérica

Publicated to:Saguntum - Papeles Del Laboratorio De Arqueología De Valencia. 53 (53): 35-57 - 2021-01-01 53(53), DOI: 10.7203/SAGVNTVM.53.20784

Authors: Mederos Martín, Alfredo

Affiliations

Univ Autonoma Madrid, Dept Prehist & Arqueol, Madrid, Spain - Author

Abstract

El hallazgo de las cerámicas fenicias más antiguas en la península ibérica está relacionado con la presencia de santuarios litorales en Huelva, en la desembocadura de los ríos Tinto y Odiel, y La Rebanadilla (Málaga) en la desembocadura del río Guadalhorce. El santuario estaba bien conservado en La Rebanadilla, pero debió ser destruido en Huelva por la extracción mecánica del sedimento, al estar bajo el agua, por debajo del nivel freático, aunque el santuario sí se conservaba en estratos superiores de los siglos VIII-VI a. C.. Los artefactos recuperados incluyen la presencia de betilos y diversas artesanías que sugieren que nos encontramos en un contexto sacro con ofrendas y talleres anexos al santuario. Destaca la calidad y cantidad de las cerámicas importadas: fenicias orientales, geométricas griegas, chipriotas, sardas y vilanovianas. Las dataciones radiocarbónicas de ambos santuarios se sitúan entre el 971-921 a. C. para La Rebanadilla y 968-845 a. C. para Huelva.

Keywords

AgeBaetyliGreek geometric potteryIberian peninsulaPhoeniciansSanctuariesTrade

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Saguntum - Papeles Del Laboratorio De Arqueología De Valencia due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency Scopus (SJR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2021, it was in position , thus managing to position itself as a Q2 (Segundo Cuartil), in the category Archeology (Arts and Humanities).

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from World Citations from Scopus Elsevier, it yields a value for the Field-Weighted Citation Impact from the Scopus agency: 2.17, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: ESI Nov 14, 2024)

This information is reinforced by other indicators of the same type, which, although dynamic over time and dependent on the set of average global citations at the time of their calculation, consistently position the work at some point among the top 50% most cited in its field:

  • Normalized Impact calculated by Dialnet Metrics: 15.79 (source consulted: Dialnet Metrics Dec 2023)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-06-14, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 2
  • Scopus: 5
  • Google Scholar: 4
  • OpenCitations: 2

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-06-14:

  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 6 (PlumX).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.
  • Additionally, the work has been submitted to a journal classified as Diamond in relation to this type of editorial policy.

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: First Author (MEDEROS MARTIN, ALFREDO) and Last Author (MEDEROS MARTIN, ALFREDO).

the author responsible for correspondence tasks has been MEDEROS MARTIN, ALFREDO.