{rfName}
Po

Indexed in

License and use

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Planas AAuthor

Share

Publications
>
Review

Postoperative nausea and vomiting and opioid-induced nausea and vomiting: guidelines for prevention and treatment

Publicated to:Revista Espanola de Anestesiologia y Reanimacion. 57 (8): 508-524 - 2010-01-01 57(8), DOI: 10.1016/S0034-9356(10)70711-8

Authors: Gómez-Arnau JI, Aguilar JL, Bovaira P, Bustos F, De Andrés J, de la Pinta JC, García-Fernández J, López-Alvarez S, López-Olaondo L, Neira F, Planas A, Pueyo J, Vila P, Torres LM, Grupo de Trabajo de NVPO de la Sociedad Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación

Affiliations

Clínica Universitaria de Navarra - Author
Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo - Author
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Juan Canalejo - Author
Hospital General Universitario de Valencia - Author
Hospital Infantil La Paz - Author
Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol - Author
Hospital Universitari Son Llàtzer - Author
Hospital Universitario de la Princesa - Author
Hospital Universitario de Puerto Real - Author
Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón - Author
Hospital Universitario Fundacion Jimenez Diaz - Author
Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar - Author
See more

Abstract

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) causes patient discomfort, lowers patient satisfaction, and increases care requirements. Opioid-induced nausea and vomiting (OINV) may also occur if opioids are used to treat postoperative pain. These guidelines aim to provide recommendations for the prevention and treatment of both problems. A working group was established in accordance with the charter of the Sociedad Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación. The group undertook the critical appraisal of articles relevant to the management of PONV and OINV in adults and children early and late in the perioperative period. Discussions led to recommendations, summarized as follows: 1) Risk for PONV should be assessed in all patients undergoing surgery; 2 easy-to-use scales are useful for risk assessment: the Apfel scale for adults and the Eberhart scale for children. 2) Measures to reduce baseline risk should be used for adults at moderate or high risk and all children. 3) Pharmacologic prophylaxis with 1 drug is useful for patients at low risk (Apfel or Eberhart 1) who are to receive general anesthesia; patients with higher levels of risk should receive prophylaxis with 2 or more drugs and baseline risk should be reduced (multimodal approach). 4) Dexamethasone, droperidol, and ondansetron (or other setrons) have similar levels of efficacy; drug choice should be made based on individual patient factors. 5) The drug prescribed for treating PONV should preferably be different from the one used for prophylaxis; ondansetron is the most effective drug for treating PONV. 6) Risk for PONV should be assessed before discharge after outpatient surgery or on the ward for hospitalized patients; there is no evidence that late preventive strategies are effective. 7) The drug of choice for preventing OINV is droperidol.

Keywords

AnalgesiaClinical practice guidelinesEpidemiologyOpioidsPatient-controlledPostoperative nauseaPreventionRisk factorsTreatmentVomiting

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Revista Espanola de Anestesiologia y Reanimacion, Q3 Agency Scopus (SJR), its regional focus and specialization in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, give it significant recognition in a specific niche of scientific knowledge at an international level.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from the Field Citation Ratio (FCR) of the Dimensions source, it yields a value of: 3.78, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: Dimensions Jun 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-06-23, the following number of citations:

  • Scopus: 28
  • OpenCitations: 22

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-06-23:

  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 178 (PlumX).