{rfName}
Ma

Indexed in

License and use

Citations

2

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Rey Aramendia, MatildeAuthor

Share

May 3, 2021
Publications
>
Article
No

Mainstream de género

Publicated to:Eunomía: Revista En Cultura De La Legalidad. (19): 331-341 - 2020-01-01 (19), DOI: 10.20318/eunomia.2020.5715

Authors: Rey Aramendía, Matilde

Affiliations

Universidad Autónoma de Madrid - Author

Abstract

El artículo aborda el surgimiento del mainstreaming de género como estrategia transformadora para implementar políticas públicas de igualdad. El brote de esta estrategia, que debe entenderse como parte del desarrollo que las políticas públicas de igualdad han experimentado desde su nacimiento en los años setenta, ha supuesto un gran avance, ya que por primera vez plantea cuestionar las estructuras sociales, culturales, políticas y económicas que perpetúan la desigualdad para transformarlas a través de la articulación de políticas. Sin embargo, pese al entusiasmo inicial, sus resultados prácticos están lejos de cumplir con sus objetivos teóricos, por lo que ha sido también objeto de numerosas críticas. A lo largo de estas páginas intentaremos proporcionar una comprensión amplia de esta estrategia.

Keywords

EqualityFeminismGenderMainstreamPublic policies

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from the Field Citation Ratio (FCR) of the Dimensions source, it yields a value of: 1.06, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: Dimensions Jul 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-07-18, the following number of citations:

  • Scopus: 1

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-07-18:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 418.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 431 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 1.75.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 4 (Altmetric).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.
  • Additionally, the work has been submitted to a journal classified as Diamond in relation to this type of editorial policy.

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: First Author (REY ARAMENDIA, MATILDE) and Last Author (REY ARAMENDIA, MATILDE).