{rfName}
Di

License and use

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Guillamon, IsabelAuthorVieira, SebastianAuthorSuderow, HermannAuthor
Share
Publications
>
Article

Disordered hyperuniformity in superconducting vortex lattices

Publicated to:Physical Review Research. 2 (3): 033133- - 2020-07-24 2(3), DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033133

Authors: Llorens, Jose Benito; Guillamon, Isabel; Serrano, Ismael G; Cordoba, Rosa; Sese, Javier; Maria De Teresa, Jose; Ricardo Ibarra, M; Vieira, Sebastian; Ortuno, Miguel; Suderow, Hermann

Affiliations

Univ Autonoma Madrid, Condensed Matter Phys Ctr, Madrid 28049, Spain - Author
Univ Autonoma Madrid, Inst Nicolas Cabrera, Dept Fis Mat Condensada, Lab Bajas Temp & Altos Campos Magnet,CSIC,Unidad, Madrid 28049, Spain - Author
Univ Murcia, Dept Fis, CIOyN, Murcia 30071, Spain - Author
Univ Valencia, Inst Ciencia Mol, Catedrat Jose Beltran 2, Paterna 46980, Spain - Author
Univ Zaragoza, Dept Fis Mat Condensada, CSIC, Zaragoza 50009, Spain - Author
Univ Zaragoza, Inst Ciencia Mat Aragon ICMA, CSIC, Zaragoza 50009, Spain - Author
Univ Zaragoza, Inst Nanociencia Aragon INA, Lab Microscopias Avanzadas LMA, Zaragoza 50018, Spain - Author
See more

Abstract

Keywords

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from the Field Citation Ratio (FCR) of the Dimensions source, it yields a value of: 3.42, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: Dimensions May 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-05-02, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 11
  • Scopus: 13
  • Google Scholar: 13
  • Open Alex: 14
  • OpenCitations: 14
Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-05-02:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 16.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 16 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 0.25.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 1 (Altmetric).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.
  • Assignment of a Handle/URN as an identifier within the deposit in the Institutional Repository: https://repositorio.uam.es/handle/10486/704038
Leadership analysis of institutional authors

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: First Author (Llorens, Jose Benito) and Last Author (SUDEROW RODRIGUEZ, HERMANN JESUS).