{rfName}
Im

Indexed in

License and use

Citations

64

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Ruiz Dominguez, Jose AntonioAuthor

Share

March 2, 2021
Publications
>
Article
No

Impacto de la pandemia COVID-19 en urgencias: primeros hallazgos en un hospital de Madrid.

Publicated to:ANALES DE PEDIATRIA. 93 (5): 313-322 - 2020-01-01 93(5), DOI: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2020.06.021

Authors: Molina Gutiérrez, Miguel Ángel; Ruiz Domínguez, José Antonio; Bueno Barriocanal, Marta; Miguel Lavisier, Begoña de; López López, Rosario; Sánchez, Julia Martín; Ceano-Vivas La Calle, María de

Affiliations

Hosp Univ La Paz, Serv Urgencias Pediat, Madrid, Spain - Author

Abstract

Introducción SARS-CoV-2, responsable de la enfermedad por coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19), fue detectado por primera vez en España el 31 de enero de 2020. El 14 de marzo fue declarado el estado de alarma con el objetivo de controlar la pandemia. El objetivo de este estudio es analizar las consecuencias de esta crisis sanitaria sobre el patrón de demanda asistencial, así como el manejo y las características de los pacientes con sospecha de COVID-19 en el Servicio de Urgencias Pediátricas.

Keywords

childrencovid-19medicina pediátrica de urgenciaspaediatric emergency medicinepandemiapandemicsCoronavirus disease 2019Paediatric emergency medicinePandemics

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal ANALES DE PEDIATRIA, and although the journal is classified in the quartile Q4 (Agencia WoS (JCR)), its regional focus and specialization in Pediatrics, give it significant recognition in a specific niche of scientific knowledge at an international level.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from World Citations provided by WoS (ESI, Clarivate), it yields a value for the citation normalization relative to the expected citation rate of: 3.28. This indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: ESI Nov 14, 2024)

This information is reinforced by other indicators of the same type, which, although dynamic over time and dependent on the set of average global citations at the time of their calculation, consistently position the work at some point among the top 50% most cited in its field:

  • Field Citation Ratio (FCR) from Dimensions: 8.96 (source consulted: Dimensions Jul 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-07-18, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 28

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-07-18:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 128.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 160 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 6.35.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 12 (Altmetric).