{rfName}
Ze

License and use

Icono OpenAccess

Altmetrics

Grant support

The authors thank J. Ripoche for having numerically identified the lower bound on the particle-number variance for open-shell systems and for pointing it out to them and W. Ryssens for useful discussions. This project is supported by the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie Grant Agreement No. 839847, the Max Planck Society and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) -Project-ID 279384907 -SFB 1245. The authors thank Heiko Hergert for sharing his spherical HFB code and Robert Roth for providing them with the interaction matrix elements.

Analysis of institutional authors

Bally, BAuthor

Share

November 30, 2020
Publications
>
Article

Zero-pairing limit of Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov reference states

Publicated to:PHYSICAL REVIEW C. 102 (5): 054320- - 2020-11-13 102(5), DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.102.054320

Authors: Duguet, T.; Bally, B.; Tichai, A.;

Affiliations

‎ GSI Helmholtzzentrum Schwerionenforsch GmbH, ExtreMe Matter Inst EMMI, D-64291 Darmstadt, Germany - Author
‎ Katholieke Univ Leuven, Inst Voor Kern Stralingsfys, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium - Author
‎ Max Planck Inst Kernphys, D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany - Author
‎ Tech Univ Darmstadt, Inst Kernphys, D-64289 Darmstadt, Germany - Author
‎ Univ Autonoma Madrid, Dept Fis Teor, E-28049 Madrid, Spain - Author
‎ Univ Paris Saclay, CEA, IRFU, F-91191 Gif Sur Yvette, France - Author
‎ Univ Paris Saclay, Dept Phys Nucl, IRFU, ESNT,CEA Saclay,DRF, F-91191 Gif Sur Yvette, France - Author
See more

Abstract

Background: The variational Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov (HFB) mean-field theory is the starting point of various (ab initio) many-body methods dedicated to superfluid systems. In this context, pairing correlations may be driven towards zero either on purpose via HFB calculations constrained on, e.g., the particle-number variance or simply because internucleon interactions cannot sustain pairing correlations in the first place in, e.g., closed-shell systems. While taking this limit constitutes a text-book problem when the system is of closed-shell character, it is typically, although wrongly, thought to be ill-defined whenever the naive filling of single-particle levels corresponds to an open-shell system.Purpose: The present work demonstrates that the zero-pairing limit of an HFB state is well-defined independently of the average particle number A it is constrained to. Still, the nature of the limit state is shown to depend on the regime, i.e., on whether the nucleus characterizes as a closed-shell or an open-shell system when taking the limit. Finally, the consequences of the zero-pairing limit on Bogoliubov many-body perturbation theory (BMBPT) calculations performed on top of the HFB reference state are illustrated.Methods: The zero-pairing limit of a HFB state constrained to carry an arbitrary (integer) number of particles A on average is worked out analytically and realized numerically using a two-nucleon interaction derived within the frame of chiral effective field theory.Results: The zero-pairing limit of the HFB state is mathematically well-defined, independently of the closed-or open-shell character of the system in the limit. Still, the nature of the limit state strongly depends on the underlying shell structure and on the associated naive filling reached in the zero-pairing limit for the particle number A of interest. First, the textbook situation is recovered for closed-shell systems, i.e., the limit state is reached for a finite value of the pairing strength (the well-known BardeenCooperSchrieffer (BCS) collapse) and takes the form of a single Slater determinant displaying (i) zero pairing energy, (ii) nondegenerate elementary excitations, and (iii) zero particle-number variance. Contrarily, a nonstandard situation is obtained for open-shell systems, i.e., the limit state is only reached for a zero value of the pairing interaction (no BCS collapse) and takes the form of a specific finite linear combination of Slater determinants displaying (a) a nonzero pairing energy, (b) degenerate elementary excitations, and (c) a nonzero particle-number variance for which an analytical formula is derived. This nonzero particle-number variance acts as a lower bound that depends in a specific way on the number of valence nucleons and on the degeneracy of the valence shell. All these findings are confirmed and illustrated numerically. Last but not least, BMBPT calculations of closed-shell (open-shell) nuclei are shown to be well-defined (ill-defined) in the zero-pairing limit.Conclusions: While HFB theory has been intensively scrutinized formally and numerically over the last decades, it still uncovers unknown and somewhat unexpected features. In the present paper, the zero-pairing limit of a HFB state carrying an arbitrary number of particles has been worked out and shown to lead to drastic differences and consequences depending on the closed-shell or open-shell nature of the system in that limit. From a general perspective, the present analysis demonstrates that HFB theory does not reduce to HF theory when the pairing field is driven to zero in the HFB Hamiltonian matrix.

Keywords

Astronomia / físicaBiotecnologíaEngenharias iiiEngenharias ivGeociênciasInterdisciplinarNuclear and high energy physicsPhysics, nuclearQuímica

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal PHYSICAL REVIEW C due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency Scopus (SJR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2020, it was in position , thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Nuclear and High Energy Physics. Notably, the journal is positioned above the 90th percentile.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from the Field Citation Ratio (FCR) of the Dimensions source, it yields a value of: 6.07, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: Dimensions Jul 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-07-16, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 5
  • Scopus: 8

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-07-16:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 5.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 5 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 0.5.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 2 (Altmetric).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.
  • Assignment of a Handle/URN as an identifier within the deposit in the Institutional Repository: https://repositorio.uam.es/handle/10486/703694

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

This work has been carried out with international collaboration, specifically with researchers from: Belgium; France; Germany.