Psychological interventions for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A systematic review and meta-analysis
Publicated to:REVISTA MEDICA DE CHILE. 147 (11): 1423-1436 - 2019-01-01 147(11), DOI: 10.4067/s0034-98872019001101423
Authors: Gonzalez-Burboa, Alexis; Acevedo Cossio, Carlos; Vera-Calzaretta, Aldo; Villaseca-Silva, Patricia; Muller-Ortiz, Hans; Paez Rovira, Dario; Pedreros Rosales, Cristian; Alberquilla Menendez-Asenjo, Angel; Otero Puime, Angel;
Affiliations
Abstract
Background: Affordable interventions to improve metabolic control of Type 2-Diabetes Mellitus are increasingly necessary. Aim: To review systematically the existing literature on the effects of psychological interventions on Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus compensation. Material and Methods: We performed a systematic literature review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of psychological interventions implemented for Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus patients. Research included the following electronic databases: PubMed, Bireme, Web of Science, SciELO, Embase, EBSCOhost, SCOPUS, Psychology Database. Results: Most studies showed a decrease in the level of glycated hemoglobin after interventions, which applied different initiatives complementary to standard medical treatment. Mainly, these interventions encompassed training for self-monitoring and control of diabetes based on cognitive behavioral psychology, counseling, self-assessment and physical-spiritual work based on transpersonal psychology. Conclusions: Psychological tools could be an adjunct to the standard medical treatment for patients with Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus, reducing glycated hemoglobin levels and improving self-regulation, disease awareness and adherence from the self-efficacy perception perspective.
Keywords
Quality index
Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel
The work has been published in the journal REVISTA MEDICA DE CHILE, and although the journal is classified in the quartile Q4 (Agencia WoS (JCR)), its regional focus and specialization in Medicine, General & Internal, give it significant recognition in a specific niche of scientific knowledge at an international level.
From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from the Field Citation Ratio (FCR) of the Dimensions source, it yields a value of: 1.38, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: Dimensions Aug 2025)
Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-08-14, the following number of citations:
- WoS: 5
- Scopus: 6
Impact and social visibility
Leadership analysis of institutional authors
This work has been carried out with international collaboration, specifically with researchers from: Chile.
There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: Last Author (OTERO PUIME, ANGEL ANTONIO).