{rfName}
Co

Indexed in

License and use

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Frias Iniesta, Jesus AAuthorGuerra Lopez, Pedro EnriqueAuthorCarcas, AjAuthor
Share
Publications
>
Article

Comparative bioavailability of two oral 875/125mg sachet formulations of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in healthy volunteers

Publicated to:CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION. 18 (3): 217-224 - 1999-10-08 18(3), DOI: 10.2165/00044011-199918030-00006

Authors: Galvez-Mugica, MA; Frias-Iniesta, J; Guerra, P; Carcas, AJ; Fernandez-Aijon, A; Montuenga, C; Gomez-Barrios, E

Affiliations

Hospital Universitario La Paz - Author
Labs Normon, Dept I&D, Madrid, Spain - Author
Univ Autonoma Madrid, Fac Med, Det Farmacol & Terapeut, Serv Farmacol Clin, E-28029 Madrid, Spain - Author
Univ Autonoma Madrid, Hosp La Paz, Serv Farmacol Clin, E-28029 Madrid, Spain - Author

Abstract

Objectives and Design: The aim of this single-dose, randomised, two-sequence, crossover study in 24 healthy volunteers was to establish the bioequivalence of two different sachet formulations of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 875/125mg (Augmentine(R) and Duonasa(R)). Patients and Methods: Twenty-four healthy volunteers aged 18 to 30 years fasted from 10 hours before until 2.5 hours after administration of each sachet. Venous blood samples were taken prior to each administration and at 14 different times within 24 hours after the dose, and plasma concentrations of amoxicillin and clavulanic acid were determined by high performance liquid chromatography. Clinical adverse events were recorded after an open question and a symptoms checklist during the study. Main Outcome Measures: For the purpose of bioequivalence analysis, area under the curve (AUC) and peak plasma concentration (C-max) were considered to be primary variables and time to C-max (t(max)) a secondary one. C-max and t(max) were obtained directly from plasma data, the elimination rate constant (k(el)) was estimated by log-linear regression, and AUC was calculated by the trapezoidal rule. AUC and C-max were tested for bioequivalence after log-transformation of data. Results: The 90% standard confidence intervals (CI) of the mean AUC values for the test/reference ratios were 1.01 to 1.18 for amoxicillin and 0.87 to 1.06 for clavulanic acid. There was no significant difference in the bioavailability of either product judged from Cmax ratios for amoxicillin (90% CI 1.01 to 1.16) and clavulanic acid (90% CI 0.90 to 1.12). These results were within the bioequivalence acceptable range of 90% CI 0.80 to 1.25. Overall, disposition parameters for these formulations were roughly proportional to those found in the literature after single-dose administration of other formulations with different strengths and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid ratios. Importantly, interindividual variability values were consistent with these previously reported. Conclusions: The two formulations were found to be bioequivalent and, therefore, interchangeable.

Keywords
BioequivalencePharmacokinetics

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency Scopus (SJR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 1999, it was in position , thus managing to position itself as a Q2 (Segundo Cuartil), in the category Medicine (Miscellaneous). Notably, the journal is positioned en el Cuartil Q4 for the agency WoS (JCR) in the category Pharmacology & Pharmacy.

Independientemente del impacto esperado determinado por el canal de difusión, es importante destacar el impacto real observado de la propia aportación.

Según las diferentes agencias de indexación, el número de citas acumuladas por esta publicación hasta la fecha 2025-05-25:

  • WoS: 5
  • Scopus: 5
  • OpenCitations: 4
Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-05-25:

  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 9 (PlumX).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.
Leadership analysis of institutional authors

the author responsible for correspondence tasks has been Frias-Iniesta, J.