{rfName}
¿

Indexed in

License and use

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Dones Sánchez MAuthorBarbero Gutiérrez JAuthor

Share

February 21, 2018
Publications
>
Article
No

¿Cómo percibimos los profesionales el acompañamiento espiritual en los equipos de Cuidados Paliativos en España?

Publicated to:Medicina Paliativa. 23 (2): 63-71 - 2016-04-01 23(2), DOI: 10.1016/j.medipa.2013.07.002

Authors: Dones Sánchez, Mónica; Collette, Nadia; Barbero Gutiérrez, Javier; Gomis Bofill, Clara; Balbuena Mora Figueroa, Pilar; Benito Oliver, Enric

Affiliations

Blanquerna University - Author
Estrategia Balear de Cuidados Paliativos - Author
Fundación Instituto San José - Author
Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau - Author
Hospital Universitario de Puerto Real - Author
Hospital Universitario La Paz - Author
See more

Abstract

Keywords

Palliative careSpiritual careSpiritualitySufferingTeam work

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Medicina Paliativa due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency Dialnet (Dialnet Métricas). In the year of publication of the work, 2016, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil).

Notably, the journal is positioned in the Quartile Q3 for the agency Scopus (SJR), in the category Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from World Citations from Scopus Elsevier, it yields a value for the Field-Weighted Citation Impact from the Scopus agency: 1.19, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: ESI Nov 14, 2024)

This information is reinforced by other indicators of the same type, which, although dynamic over time and dependent on the set of average global citations at the time of their calculation, consistently position the work at some point among the top 50% most cited in its field:

  • Field Citation Ratio (FCR) from Dimensions: 1.64 (source consulted: Dimensions Jul 2025)
  • Normalized Impact calculated by Dialnet Metrics: 33.33 (source consulted: Dialnet Metrics Dec 2023)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-07-16, the following number of citations:

  • Scopus: 7

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-07-16:

  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 87 (PlumX).