{rfName}
Ef

Indexed in

License and use

Altmetrics

Impact on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Analysis of institutional authors

Gilsanz Rodríguez FAuthor
Share
Publications
>
Article

Efedrina frente a fenilefrina en bolo e infusión continua para prevención de la hipotensión arterial secundaria a la anestesia subaracnoidea en cesáreas. Estudio prospectivo, aleatorizado

Publicated to:Revista Espanola de Anestesiologia y Reanimacion. 58 (7): 412-416 - 2011-01-01 58(7), DOI: 10.1016/s0034-9356(11)70104-9

Authors: Alday Muñoz E; Palacio Abizanda F; De Diego P; Gilsanz Rodríguez F

Affiliations

Hospital Universitario de la Princesa - Author

Abstract

Subarachnoid spinal anesthesia for cesarean section is associated with a high incidence of hypotension, which can require the use of vasoconstrictors. The aim of this trial was to compare ephedrine to phenylephrine for the prevention of secondary hypotension and to assess the adverse effects on both mother and newborn.Eighty patients undergoing elective or emergency cesarean section, in the absence of uterine activity or fetal risk, were randomized to receive prophylaxis with ephedrine or phenylephrine immediately after the spinal block. Patients in the ephedrine group received an intravenous bolus of 0.1 mg/kg plus continuous infusion at a rate of 0.5 mg/kg/h; patients in the phenylephrine group received an intravenous bolus of 1.5 microg/kg plus a continuous infusion at 1.5 microg/kg/min. Infusion was maintained until umbilical cord clamping. We recorded maternal blood pressure, heart rate, nausea and vomiting, dizziness, bradycardia, hypotension, hypertension, fetal Apgar index, and umbilical cord blood parameters (pH, PCO2, and HCO3).The overall incidence of hypotension was 11.2%, with no significant between-group differences (ephedrine group, 11.4%; phenylephrine group, 11.1%). The incidences of hypertension and bradycardia were higher in the phenylephrine group (27.8% and 2.3%, respectively) than in the ephedrine group (25% and 0%, respectively). Umbilical cord blood parameters and Apgar scores were similar. After suspension of continuous infusion, an episode of hypotension was detected in 22.5% of the patients (72.2% of these patients were in the phenylephrine group and 27.8% were in the ephedrine group).At the doses of ephedrine and phenylephrine administered in this trial, the ability of these drugs to prevent hypotension during cesarean section proved to be similar. Higher incidences of adverse events (hypertension and bradycardia) were observed in the phenylephrine group. No differences were observed in neonatal effects.

Keywords
Good health and well-being

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Revista Espanola de Anestesiologia y Reanimacion due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency Scopus (SJR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2011, it was in position , thus managing to position itself as a Q2 (Segundo Cuartil), in the category Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from the Field Citation Ratio (FCR) of the Dimensions source, it yields a value of: 1.8, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: Dimensions May 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-05-02, the following number of citations:

  • Scopus: 14
  • Open Alex: 15
  • OpenCitations: 3
Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-05-02:

  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 102 (PlumX).
Continuing with the social impact of the work, it is important to emphasize that, due to its content, it can be assigned to the area of interest of ODS 3 - Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages, with a probability of 83% according to the mBERT algorithm developed by Aurora University.
Leadership analysis of institutional authors

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: Last Author (GILSANZ RODRIGUEZ, FERNANDO).