Indexed in

License and use

Citations

Cited 8 times in

Cited 9 times in

Cited 8 times in

Altmetrics

Grant support

This study is partly funded by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III FEDER (PI08/0533, PI08/1770), the 'Accion Transversal del Cancer del Consejo de Ministros del 11/10/2007' and by the 'CIBER Epidemiologia y Salud Publica (CIBERESP)' and the Scientific Foundation of the Spanish Association Against Cancer (Fundacion Cientifica de la Asociacion Espanola Contra el Cancer (AECC)-EVP-1178/14).

Analysis of institutional authors

Share

Chemical quality of tap water in Madrid: multicase control cancer study in Spain (MCC-Spain)

Publicated to:ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH. 24 (5): 4755-4764 - 2017-02-01 24(5), DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-8203-y

Authors: Fernandez-Navarro, Pablo; Villanueva, Cristina M; Garcia-Perez, Javier; Boldo, Elena; Goni-Irigoyen, Fernando; Ulibarrena, Enrique; Rantakokko, Panu; Garcia-Esquinas, Esther; Perez-Gomez, Beatriz; Pollan, Marina; Aragones, Nuria

Affiliations

Abstract

Chronic consumption of water, which contains contaminants, may give rise to adverse health effects. The Madrid region, covered by the population-based multicase-control (MCC-Spain) study, includes two drinking water supply areas. The different sources of the water, coupled together with the possible differences in water management, mean that there may be differences in drinking water quality. In the context of the MCC study, our aims were to describe contaminant concentrations in tap water drawn from various sampling points distributed around the region, assess these concentrations by reference to guideline values and study possible differences between the two supply areas. Tap water samples were collected from 34 sampling points in 7 towns in the Madrid region (19-29 April 2010), and 23 contaminants (metals, nitrates, disinfection by-product and Mutagen X levels) were quantified. We undertook a descriptive analysis of the contaminant concentrations in the water and compared them between the two water supply areas (Wilcoxon test). We created maps representing the distribution of the concentrations observed at water sampling points and assessed the correlations (Spearman's coefficient) between the different parameters measured. The concentrations of the contaminants were below guideline values. There were differences between the two supply areas in concentration of nitrates (p value = 0.0051) and certain disinfection by-products. While there were positive correlations (rho >0.70) among some disinfection by-products, no correlations were found in metals or nitrates. The differences in nitrate levels could be linked to differences in farming/industrial activities in the catchment areas and in disinfection by-products might be related to the existence of different treatment systems or bromine content in source waters.

Keywords