{rfName}
Ma

Indexed in

License and use

Icono OpenAccess

Citations

23

Altmetrics

Grant support

C.I. acknowledges the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for a PhD studentship. This study was supported in part by the Geoffrey Beene Cancer Research Center of MSKCC (JSL), NIH NCI R35 CA232130 (JSL), and NIH U01CA221046 (JSL, BMZ), by the Centre of Excellence in Medical Engineering funded by the Wellcome Trust and EPSRC WT088641/Z/09/Z, the KCL and UCL Comprehensive Cancer Imaging Centre funded by CRUK and EPSRC in association with the MRC and DoH (England), and by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London. The authors acknowledge the MSKCC Small Animal Imaging Core Facility, the Radiochemistry and Molecular Imaging Probe Core, which were supported by NIH, grant P30 CA08748. We gratefully acknowledge William H. and Alice Goodwin and the Commonwealth Foundation for Cancer Research and The Center for Experimental Therapeutics of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the DoH.

Analysis of institutional authors

Torres, Julia BagunaAuthor

Share

January 15, 2025
Publications
>
Article

Manipulating the In Vivo Behaviour of 68Ga with Tris(Hydroxypyridinone) Chelators: Pretargeting and Blood Clearance

Publicated to:INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES. 21 (4): 1496- - 2020-02-01 21(4), DOI: 10.3390/ijms21041496

Authors: Imberti, Cinzia; Adumeau, Pierre; Blower, Julia E; Al Salemee, Fahad; Torres, Julia Baguna; Lewis, Jason S; Zeglis, Brian M; Terry, Samantha Y A; Blower, Philip J

Affiliations

CUNY Hunter Coll, Dept Chem, New York, NY 10021 USA - Author
Kings Coll London, St Thomas Hosp, Sch Biomed Engn & Imaging Sci, Fourth Floor Lambeth Wing, London SE1 7EH, England - Author
Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, New York, NY 10065 USA - Author

Abstract

Pretargeting is widely explored in immunoPET as a strategy to reduce radiation exposure of non-target organs and allow the use of short-lived radionuclides that would not otherwise be compatible with the slow pharmacokinetic profiles of antibodies. Here we investigate a pretargeting strategy based on gallium-68 and the chelator THPMe as a high-affinity pair capable of combining in vivo. After confirming the ability of THPMe to bind Ga-68 in vivo at low concentrations, the bifunctional THPMe-NCS was conjugated to a humanised huA33 antibody targeting the A33 glycoprotein. Imaging experiments performed in nude mice bearing A33-positive SW1222 colorectal cancer xenografts compared pretargeting (100 mu g of THPMe-NCS-huA33, followed after 24 h by 8-10 MBq of Ga-68(3+)) with both a directly labelled radioimmunoconjugate (Zr-89-DFO-NCS-huA33, 88 mu g, 7 MBq) and a Ga-68-only negative control (8-10 MBq of Ga-68(3+)). Imaging was performed 25 h after antibody administration (1 h after Ga-68(3+) administration for negative control). No difference between pretargeting and the negative control was observed, suggesting that pretargeting via metal chelation is not feasible using this model. However, significant accumulation of "unchelated" Ga-68(3+) in the tumour was found (12.9 %ID/g) even without prior administration of THPMe-NCS-huA33, though tumour-to-background contrast was impaired by residual activity in the blood. Therefore, the Ga-68-only experiment was repeated using THPMe (20 mu g, 1 h after Ga-68(3+) administration) to clear circulating Ga-68(3+), producing a three-fold improvement of the tumour-to-blood activity concentration ratio. Although preliminary, these results highlight the potential of THPMe as a Ga-68 clearing agent in imaging applications with gallium citrate.

Keywords

A3AgentBifunctional chelatorExpressionGa-68-citrate pet/ctGallium-68HydroxypyridinonesIronMetal chelationMonoclonal antibodiesPretargetingProstate-cancerRadionuclide imagingTarget

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2020, it was in position 67/295, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Biochemistry & Molecular Biology.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from the Field Citation Ratio (FCR) of the Dimensions source, it yields a value of: 1.56, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: Dimensions Jul 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-07-19, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 11

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-07-19:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 14.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 14 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 0.25.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 1 (Altmetric).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

This work has been carried out with international collaboration, specifically with researchers from: United Kingdom; United States of America.