{rfName}
Di

Indexed in

License and use

Citations

26

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Jesús Alonso TapiaAuthorMiguel ángel Ruiz DíazAuthorJuan Antonio Huertas MartínezAuthor

Share

Publications
>
Article

Differences in classroom motivational climate: causes, effects and implications for teacher education. A multilevel study

Publicated to:Anales De Psicologia. 36 (1): 122 - 133 - 2020-01-01 36(1), DOI: 10.6018/analesps.337911

Authors: Jesús Alonso Tapia; Miguel Ángel Ruiz Díaz; Juan Antonio Huertas Martínez

Affiliations

Abstract

La investigación sobre el clima motivacional en el aula (CMC) ha mostrado diferencias significativas entre las aulas en CMC. Sin embargo, no se sabe si el conocimiento motivacional de los docentes y las metas y expectativas relacionadas con sus alumnos contribuyen a tales diferencias y, en consecuencia, a los efectos de la CMC en los alumnos. Para responder a esta pregunta, un modelo multinivel de las relaciones entre a) el conocimiento y las características motivacionales de los profesores, b) las metas y expectativas de los estudiantes (SGE), c) la percepción de CMC, y d) la atribución de los estudiantes de la mejora motivacional percibida a los maestros (APMIT) se probó utilizando métodos de ecuaciones estructurales. Un total de 2.223 estudiantes de secundaria y preparatoria y sus 95 profesores participaron en el estudio

Keywords

Classroom motivational climateGrupo cPsicologíaPsicología y educaciónStudent motivationStudents' goal-orientationsTeachers' expectanciesTeachers' goals on studentsTeachers' motivational knowledge

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Anales De Psicologia due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency Scopus (SJR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2020, it was in position , thus managing to position itself as a Q2 (Segundo Cuartil), in the category Psychology (Miscellaneous). Notably, the journal is positioned en el Cuartil Q3 for the agency WoS (JCR) in the category Psychology, Multidisciplinary.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from World Citations provided by WoS (ESI, Clarivate), it yields a value for the citation normalization relative to the expected citation rate of: 1.19. This indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: ESI Nov 14, 2024)

This information is reinforced by other indicators of the same type, which, although dynamic over time and dependent on the set of average global citations at the time of their calculation, consistently position the work at some point among the top 50% most cited in its field:

  • Field Citation Ratio (FCR) from Dimensions: 2.85 (source consulted: Dimensions Jun 2025)
  • Normalized Impact calculated by Dialnet Metrics: 14.86 (source consulted: Dialnet Metrics Dec 2023)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-06-01, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 12
  • Google Scholar: 3
  • OpenCitations: 7

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-06-01:

  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 25 (PlumX).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: First Author (ALONSO TAPIA, JESUS) .