{rfName}
Z

License and use

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Perez-Gonzalez Y.f.Author

Share

Publications
>
Article

Z′ s in neutrino scattering at DUNE

Publicated to:PHYSICAL REVIEW D. 100 (5): - 2019-09-10 100(5), DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.055012

Authors: Ballett P; Hostert M; Pascoli S; Perez-Gonzalez YF; Tabrizi Z; Funchal RZ

Affiliations

Durham University - Author
Universidade de Sao Paulo - Author
Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho"; Theoretical Physics Department; Northwestern University; Colegio de Física Fundamental e Interdisciplinaria de las Américas (COFI) - Author

Abstract

Novel leptophilic neutral currents can be tested at upcoming neutrino oscillation experiments using two complementary processes, neutrino trident production and neutrino-electron (ν-e) elastic scattering. Considering generic anomaly-free U(1) extensions of the Standard Model, we discuss the characteristics of ν-e scattering as well as e+e- and μ+μ- trident production at the DUNE near detector in the presence of such beyond the Standard Model scenarios. We then determine the sensitivity of DUNE in constraining the well-known Le-Lμ and Lμ-Lτ models. We conclude that DUNE will be able to probe these leptophilic models with unprecedented sensitivity, covering unproved explanations of the (g-2)μ discrepancy.

Keywords

Astronomia / físicaAstronomy & astrophysicsBiotecnologíaEngenharias iiiEngenharias ivEnsinoGeociênciasInterdisciplinarMatemática / probabilidade e estatísticaNuclear and high energy physicsPhysics and astronomy (miscellaneous)Physics, particles & fields

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal PHYSICAL REVIEW D due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2019, it was in position , thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category .

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from the Field Citation Ratio (FCR) of the Dimensions source, it yields a value of: 21.23, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: Dimensions Jun 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-06-17, the following number of citations:

  • Scopus: 57
  • OpenCitations: 42

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-06-17:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 10.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 10 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 1.5.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 4 (Altmetric).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.