{rfName}
Th

Indexed in

License and use

Citations

33

Altmetrics

Grant support

We thank Markus Arnold, Mary E. Barth (senior editor and discussant) , Ulf Brudggemann, Christina Dargenidou (discussant) , Matt Hall, Kevin Jackson, Peter Joos, Guy Jubb, Laurence van Lent (editor) , Victor Maas, Stephen Taylor (discussant) , Geoffrey Whittington, Stephen Zeff, and participants at the 2016 British Accounting and Finance Association Annual Conference, 2015 European Accounting Association-ICAS Symposium, 2016 European Accounting Association Annual Congress, 2015 IASB-ICAS Meeting on the Future of Financial Reporting, 2015 European University Foundation Conference, 2017 XII Workshop on Empirical Research in Financial Accounting, University of Amsterdam, University of Bath, University of Bologna, BI Norwegian Business School, Cardiff University, Columbia University Business School, ESSEC Business School, University of Essex, Ghent University, University of Glasgow, Heriot-Watt University, Humboldt University of Berlin, 2017 ICJCE/AT1 Madrid Meeting, 2016 International Forum of Accounting Standard Setters Meeting in Toronto, Keele University School of Management, King's College London, Lancaster University, LUISS Business School, Magdeburg University, The University of Manchester, Mannheim University, Open University, Portsmouth University, Universidade de Sao Paulo, University of St.Gallen, Stockholm School of Economics, Strathclyde University, Tilburg University, National Taiwan University, and University of Technology Sydney for helpful comments and discussions. We are grateful to Michelle Crickett, Francoise Flores, Saskia Slomp, Rasmus Sommer, and Allister Wilson, who provided invaluable assistance for this project. We acknowledge the financial support of the Scottish Accountancy Trust for Education and Research, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS) , and the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) . Beatriz Garca Osma acknowledges financial assistance from the Spanish Ministry of Science (ECO2016-77579 and PID2019-111143GB-C33) . Joachim Gassen acknowledges financial support from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft-Project-ID 403041268-TRR 266. Ethical approval for this project was granted at the University of Bristol. Finally, we acknowledge the contribution of Thomas Jeanjean to the earlier phases of our study. Any remaining errors are our own.

Analysis of institutional authors

Osma, BgAuthor

Share

February 3, 2022
Publications
>
Article
No

The Usefulness of Financial Accounting Information: Evidence from the Field

Publicated to:ACCOUNTING REVIEW. 96 (6): 73-102 - 2021-11-01 96(6), DOI: 10.2308/TAR-2019-1030

Authors: Cascino, Stefano; Clatworthy, Mark A.; Garcia Osma, Beatriz; Gassen, Joachim; Imam, Shahed;

Affiliations

Humboldt Univ, Sch Business & Econ, Berlin, Germany - Author
London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Dept Accounting, London, England - Author
Univ Bristol, Sch Accounting & Finance, Bristol, Avon, England - Author
Univ Carlos III Madrid, Dept Business Adm, Getafe, Spain - Author
Univ Warwick, Warwick Business Sch, Dept Accounting, Coventry, W Midlands, England - Author
See more

Abstract

We examine how investment professionals assess the usefulness of financial accounting information depending on their information acquisition objectives and preparers' earnings management incentives. We conduct a survey experiment based on face-to-face interviews with investment professionals and document two main results. First, we find that, compared with investment professionals assigned a firm valuation objective, those assigned a managerial performance evaluation objective assess accounting information as significantly less useful. Second, we find no systematic evidence that preparers' earnings management incentives negatively affect investment professionals' assessments of accounting information usefulness. To elucidate this second finding, we conduct a large-scale follow-up online experiment. Our results continue to offer no support for the effect of earnings management incentives on investment professionals' assessments of accounting information usefulness, irrespective of preparers' corporate governance quality. Instead, we find that poor corporate governance, by itself, reduces the usefulness of accounting information to investment professionals.

Keywords

AnalystsBoardBonus schemesCorporate governanceDecision usefulnessDeterminantsEarnings managementFinancial reporting objectivesGaapIncentive contractsInvestment professionalsInvestors assessmentsMeasurement basesRelevanceRepresentational faithfulnessUsers

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal ACCOUNTING REVIEW due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2021, it was in position 14/111, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Business, Finance.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from the Field Citation Ratio (FCR) of the Dimensions source, it yields a value of: 14.03, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: Dimensions Jul 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-07-19, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 5

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-07-19:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 151.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 170 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 5.

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

This work has been carried out with international collaboration, specifically with researchers from: Germany; United Kingdom.